GEPTA/40&over/3.5M/Tepsick/TW

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.44 / GEPTA

Schedule

Flight standings8 teams · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/Jones/Adult40&over/3.5M	9	0	29	7	18	255
2GEPTA/40&over/3.5M/Ferris/EPCC	7	2	20	16	36	343
3GEPTA/40&over/3.5M/Pineda/FB	7	2	19	17	36	292
4GEPTA/40&over/3.5M/Smith/CCC	6	3	20	16	42	322
5GEPTA/40&over/3.5M/Melendez/EPTC#1	3	6	19	17	36	306
6GEPTA/40&over/3.5M/Tepsick/TW	3	6	17	19	47	358
7GEPTA/40&over/3.5M/Lopez/EPTC#2	1	8	12	24	53	374
8GEPTA/40&over/3.5M/Estrada/EPTC#4	0	9	8	28	57	393

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43

Humberto Cardiel

usually #2 Doubles 32%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 3.5

3.31

Carlos de Regules

usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3.5

3.17

Daniel Trejo

usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5

3.14

Eloy Tinajero

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5

2.99

Findlay Yepo

usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5

2.93

Carlos Juan Carvallo

usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

2.93

Ed Savedra

usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5

2.90

Christopher Mowad

usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

—

Jeffrey Alley

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published —

—

Jeffrey Tepsick

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Jimmy Prince

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Luis Blasco

usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published —

—

Marco Prince

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Osvaldo Orozco

usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Ricardo Ortiz

usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published —

—

Thomas Lore

usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

William Tepsick

usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published —

—

Yevgenko Makarov

usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Lore + Marco Prince	3–3	56% games	+6.1% vs expected
Thomas Lore + Yevgenko Makarov	5–3	57% games	+4.0% vs expected
Jeffrey Alley + Yevgenko Makarov	4–1	54% games	−4.5% vs expected
Luis Blasco + Carlos Juan Carvallo	1–6	37% games	−4.5% vs expected
Thomas Lore + Jeffrey Alley	11–5	52% games	−6.3% vs expected
Jeffrey Tepsick + Jimmy Prince	5–10	46% games	−8.4% vs expected
Carlos de Regules + Yevgenko Makarov	9–5	48% games	not enough data
Eloy Tinajero + Yevgenko Makarov	6–3	55% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5

Humberto Cardiel

54W–63L career · 24 lines in 2026

<1%71%29%

3.43

3.5

Carlos de Regules

79W–82L career · 28 lines in 2026

1%91%8%

3.31

3.5

Daniel Trejo

39W–39L career · 11 lines in 2026

10%90%1%

3.17

3.5

Eloy Tinajero

43W–41L career · 15 lines in 2026

14%86%<1%

3.14

3.5

Findlay Yepo

39W–48L career · 11 lines in 2026

54%46%<1%

2.99

3.5

Carlos Juan Carvallo

16W–47L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026

69%31%<1%

2.93

3.5

Ed Savedra

58W–75L career · 11 lines in 2026

71%29%<1%

2.93

Christopher Mowad

25W–29L career · 9 lines in 2026

<1%77%23%

2.90

—

Jeffrey Alley

46W–45L career · 8 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jeffrey Tepsick

22W–42L career · 7 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jimmy Prince

32W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Luis Blasco

32W–34L career · 19 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Marco Prince

54W–57L career · 15 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Osvaldo Orozco

40W–56L career · 15 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Ricardo Ortiz

27W–69L career · 14 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Thomas Lore

66W–72L career · 9 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

William Tepsick

21W–83L career · 16 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Yevgenko Makarov

74W–60L career · 25 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.