Teams

Marco YMCA / Pavichevich

2025 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-07vs Quail West -Won 20
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Heise / Renee Facciola vs Jane Mills / Katrina Tiedge6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBetsy Conte / Melissa Henderson vs Lynne Gorski / Jill Teberg7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-30vs Isles Of Collier - S. DavisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Lord / Renee Facciola vs Kathleen Griffin / Linda Koole7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCecilia Murphy / Joyce Hail vs Faith Irwin / Louise Decker3-6, 0-6
2025-04-23vs Olde Cypress / LoomisLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Lord / Renee Facciola vs Anastasia Brooks / Amy Enxing6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-16vs NIght Winners/Marco YMCA / BurschLost 01
L#3 DoublesBetsy Conte / Ruth Holland vs Trina Clarkson / Laura Parkey2-6, 2-6
2025-04-02vs Naples Grande / AyalaLost 02
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Heise / Kelly Lord vs Sandra Frost / Carey Mcglynn4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJan Jackman / Kristine Bergenheim vs Tracy Matley / Gail Kennedy1-6, 2-6
2025-03-26vs Fiddlers Creek / BoneventoWon 20
W#2 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Melissa Henderson vs Dawn Cooper / Dorothea Farmer6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPaula Crane / Ruth Holland vs Donna Burns / Vicky Ramuta6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Renee Facciola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Susan Juels
published
3.29
Patricia Doyen
published
3.29
Ramsay Erickson
published
3.26
Jacqueline Heise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Kelly Lord
published
3.17
Jan Jackman
published
3.17
Kristine Bergenheim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Sally Mattke
published
3.16
Marla Hoffman
published
3.06
Cecilia Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Mary Pavichevich
published
3.03
Joyce Hail
published
2.96
Ruth Holland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Janet Oliver
published
Betsy Conte
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Paula Crane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Heise + Marla Hoffman2353% games+7.2% vs expected
Jacqueline Heise + Renee Facciola3451% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Holland + Jan Jackman3443% gamesnot enough data
Kristine Bergenheim + Patricia Doyen4259% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Lord + Patricia Doyen134 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Lord + Susan Juels314 matchesnot enough data
Jan Jackman + Marla Hoffman044 matchesnot enough data
Marla Hoffman + Mary Pavichevich134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Renee Facciola
164W–112L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Susan Juels
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Patricia Doyen
15W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Ramsay Erickson
16W–25L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Jacqueline Heise
162W–149L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Kelly Lord
23W–27L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jan Jackman
12W–34L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Kristine Bergenheim
38W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Sally Mattke
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Marla Hoffman
36W–34L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Cecilia Murphy
15W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Mary Pavichevich
9W–15L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Joyce Hail
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Ruth Holland
23W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Janet Oliver
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Betsy Conte
212W–172L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Crane
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.