Teams

MAC Pettit

2023 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Jason Yost vs Carter Vick / ARUN MUNUSWAMY6-4, 7-6
2023-10-05vs HCC Blankley (men)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Lance Pessarra vs Andy Haug / Rob Chesson6-3, 6-0
2023-09-19vs ACAC Delisio / SebeticWon 10
W#3 DoublesVenkatachelam Regulagedda / Jeremy Calbreath vs Ryland Dennis / K C Funk6-4, 6-4
2023-09-12vs TCRC Young's RACWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Lance Pessarra vs Ken Lu / Julius Anongos6-3, 5-7
2023-09-05vs Avalon Tripels GraingerWon 10
W#3 DoublesLance Pessarra / Jeremy Calbreath vs Jeremy Kokemor / Jeremy Berteele6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Dylan Brod
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.81
Rob Kirkconnell
published
3.56
Jeff Kane
published
3.46
Jeremy Calbreath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Erich Yost
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.33
3.32
John Barefoot
published
3.10
Jason Yost
published
2.85
Lance Pessarra
published
Kevin Cousins
published
Zach Pettit
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Yost + Erich Yost303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dylan Brod
163W–98L career · 13 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
Rob Kirkconnell
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Jeff Kane
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Jeremy Calbreath
163W–52L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Erich Yost
140W–68L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.43
Venkatachelam Regulagedda
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
John Barefoot
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.32
Jason Yost
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
Lance Pessarra
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
Kevin Cousins
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Zach Pettit
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.