Teams

JHaslett-UNC

2026 Eno River Mixed 40 & Over · 40 & Over Mixed 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-30vs JHensley-DURLost 02
L#1 DoublesJosh Gouker / Erin Berliner vs Simone Hayward / Colin Hayward5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDestiny Lopez / Richard Saver vs Lou Hensley / Sarah Hall3-6, 6-7
2026-07-30vs ABaxley.40.3.5-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Correal / Josh Gouker vs Ivan Andjelkovic / Ann Skvarcius1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Haslett / Meng Chen vs Edward Bernier / Tenesha Carter2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDestiny Lopez / Richard Saver vs Angela Baxley / Greg Fitts0-6, 1-6
2026-07-16vs PBream-UNCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulia Haslett / Kristopher Karvelas vs Hannah White / Ruchir Vora5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Correal / Meng Chen vs Peter Z Tawil / Kristi Laan0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLindsey Gouker / Josh Gouker vs James White / Sarah Franks2-6, 4-6
2026-07-09vs LHsu-HRLost 03
L#1 DoublesSeth Noar / Barbara Correal vs Lisa Hsu / Andrew Curso1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Saver / Julia Haslett vs Gayathri Rajaraman / JEFF CHANDLER0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMeng Chen / Vera Halpern vs Abigail Hatcher / Michael Klein6-7, 2-6
2026-07-02vs LStanek-HRLost 03
L#1 DoublesSeth Noar / Erin Berliner vs Aaron Kirschenfeld / Jennifer Gillie6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMeng Chen / Vera Halpern vs Lindsay Stanek / Chris Roessler0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNathan Letts / Julia Haslett vs Pilneyo Seo / John Lockhead3-6, 0-6
2026-06-25vs SGraff.40.3.5M-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Berliner / Meng Chen vs Max Lipshitz / Meghan Smith4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarianne Gildea / Adam Hantman vs Mary T Long / Chris Reeves7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKristopher Karvelas / Vera Halpern vs Tom Luben / Regina Davis3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-11vs JHensley-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Saver / Marianne Gildea vs Simone Hayward / Steve Pigora2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Correal / Kristopher Karvelas vs Chun Lav / LUCY LAV1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLindsey Gouker / Josh Gouker vs Jennifer Hensley / Lou Hensley6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-04vs ABaxley.40.3.5-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarianne Gildea / Kristopher Karvelas vs Ivan Andjelkovic / Terry Perrone0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesErin Berliner / Seth Noar vs Ann Skvarcius / Stephen Fu4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Fioretti / Julia Haslett vs Sara Velarde / Richard Griffin1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 40 & Over Mixed 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LHsu-HR7116818180
2PBream-UNC5315918170
3LStanek-HR5316818183
4JHensley-DUR53141022209
5ABaxley.40.3.5-DUR35121227212
6SGraff.40.3.5M-DUR35101432243
7JHaslett-UNC0812346291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Marianne Gildea
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Josh Gouker
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.00
Richard Saver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Meng Chen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.92
Julia Haslett
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Seth Noar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Christopher Fioretti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Adam Hantman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Barbara Correal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Erin Berliner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Destiny Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Lindsey Gouker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.80
Vera Halpern
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Nathan Letts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vera Halpern + Meng Chen3249% gamesnot enough data
Lindsey Gouker + Josh Gouker1447% gamesnot enough data
Julia Haslett + Christopher Fioretti314 matchesnot enough data
Seth Noar + Barbara Correal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marianne Gildea
22W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.17
Josh Gouker
6W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
Richard Saver
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Meng Chen
14W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Julia Haslett
48W–55L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Seth Noar
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Christopher Fioretti
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Adam Hantman
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Barbara Correal
27W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Erin Berliner
57W–79L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Destiny Lopez
20W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Lindsey Gouker
24W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Vera Halpern
18W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Nathan Letts
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.