Teams

E.Osbourne

2023 Cap Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-01vs A.LangefeldWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Debbie Hildebran vs Michele Walker / Karen Murphy6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEllen Osbourne / Marina Barthalmus vs Karen Maus / Win Farin6-2, 6-1
2023-04-24vs C.PanzlWon 20
W#2 DoublesPeggy Dobbins / Linda Heidgerd vs Joy Cooper / Genny Igo7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarina Barthalmus / Phoebe Hill vs Melanie Waldron / Cosette Philpot7-5, 6-4
2023-04-17vs L.NogaLost 01
L#2 DoublesHelen Harris / Peggy Dobbins vs Lynda Noga / Amy Barclay2-6, 2-6
2023-04-10vs C.Conzola 55+ 3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesEllen Osbourne / Peggy Dobbins vs Lisa Kempf / Sue Norcia3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Suzanne Brown vs Julie Brigham / Carolina Robayo2-6, 4-6
2023-04-03vs A.Willard 55+Won 20
W#1 DoublesSusana Harvey / Helen Harris vs Sarah Schmalz / Ann Willard6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Suzanne Brown vs Sharon Cole / Barbara Mccartney6-3, 6-3
2023-03-20vs C.WerderSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Catherine Poulter vs Sylvie Daigle / Brook Ayres3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesPeggy Dobbins / Phoebe Hill vs Jane Stutzman / Merri Robinson6-2, 6-4
2023-03-13vs S.RoseSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHelen Harris / Susana Harvey vs Lynda Blelloch / Paula Hale6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMarina Barthalmus / Catherine Poulter vs Millie Rushton / Wanda Wilson2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Susana Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Helen Harris
published
3.32
Marina Barthalmus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Jocelyn Badulis
published
3.19
Linda Heidgerd
published
3.01
Ellen Osbourne
published
2.91
Peggy Dobbins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Dawn Johnstone
published 3
2.73
Beverly Rubin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Phoebe Hill
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susana Harvey
401W–157L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.71
Helen Harris
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Marina Barthalmus
218W–213L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Jocelyn Badulis
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Linda Heidgerd
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Ellen Osbourne
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Peggy Dobbins
53W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Dawn Johnstone
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Beverly Rubin
85W–106L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Phoebe Hill
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.