Teams

Davis/Neal/Nashville

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.80 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-26vs Feyes/Yung-Okamoto/NashvilleLost 14
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Broome / Shelby Ruehling vs Barbara Hooper / Venessa Seivers6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJill Porter vs Paula Mcgowan2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErin Neal / Elizabeth Davis vs Elizabeth Csernovicz / Stephanie Feyes4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarjorie George / Lauren Pollard vs Trina Gilbert / Katie Feyes1-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesJoy Cox / JULIE GONTAREK vs Kaly Bush / Shannon Smith3-6, 2-6
2026-04-06vs McDonald/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesBethany Liles / Joni Lee vs Saba Chishti / Hollie Williams6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesErin Neal vs Sandra Elliott6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Broome / Eileen Smith vs Crystal Wray / Lisa Blalock6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlexandra Neff / Anne Pope vs Lynelle McDonald / Chantel Wujtow6-3, 6-1
L#4 DoublesKristen Morrison / Joy Cox vs Julie Segura / Kristina Rogers6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-29vs Wallace/NashvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJoni Lee / Alexandra Neff vs Beth Werther / Tamara Graham7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Davis / Anne Pope vs Lisa Wallace / Monica McDougall1-6, 3-5
W#3 DoublesMarjorie George / Lauren Pollard vs Celia Turner / Conde Devine1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesHeather Galloway / Susana Huddleston vs Cheryl Byrd / Nita Hollis6-2, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Shelby Ruehling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Anne Pope
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Erin Neal
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.61
Bethany Liles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Elizabeth Broome
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Alexandra Neff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Lauren Tuck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.42
Lauren Pollard
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.41
Joni Lee
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.40
JULIE GONTAREK
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Marjorie George
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.36
Jill Porter
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.36
Betsy Bernstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Kristen Morrison
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Susana Huddleston
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Bennett Wolford
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Heather Galloway
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
Joy Cox
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joni Lee + Bethany Liles9071% games+18.5% vs expected
Joy Cox + Lauren Pollard4166% games+11.3% vs expected
Marjorie George + Lauren Pollard6155% games+9.4% vs expected
Betsy Bernstein + Marjorie George4451% games+0.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Broome + Shelby Ruehling3252% gamesnot enough data
Susana Huddleston + JULIE GONTAREK224 matchesnot enough data
Alexandra Neff + Lauren Pollard314 matchesnot enough data
Shelby Ruehling + Lauren Tuck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelby Ruehling
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Anne Pope
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Erin Neal
31W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63
4
Bethany Liles
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Elizabeth Broome
16W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
4
Alexandra Neff
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
Lauren Tuck
16W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Lauren Pollard
32W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Joni Lee
27W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
JULIE GONTAREK
16W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Marjorie George
17W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.39
Jill Porter
12W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Betsy Bernstein
16W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Kristen Morrison
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Susana Huddleston
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Bennett Wolford
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Heather Galloway
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Joy Cox
25W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.