Teams

Stay Local

2026 WY Tri-Level · Jackson Women 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.93 / WYOMING

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-23vs Jackson best shotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaroline Baker / Diane McGee vs Heather Silverman / Jennifer Mei2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMiranda Hoover / Kelly Milligan vs Cheri Witz / Linda Merigliano6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Watts / Lucy Emhardt vs Heather Carleton / Melinda Day1-6, 0-6
2026-07-22vs Stay LocalWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristina Peterson / Miranda Hoover vs Tami DeGrosky / Alexa Halaby6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Milligan / Shelby Johnson-sapp vs Stephanie Brennan / Lindsay Brandenburg6-4, 6-4
2026-07-22vs Jackson best shotsLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaroline Baker / Miranda Hoover vs Heather Silverman / Cheri Witz5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiane McGee / Ana Chapman vs Jennifer Mei / Linda Merigliano4-6, 1-6
2026-07-20vs Jackson best shotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaroline Baker / Diane McGee vs Heather Silverman / Jenny May1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMiranda Hoover / Kelly Milligan vs Jennifer Mei / Mimi Freymann0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAna Chapman / Suzanne Watts vs Laura Egerter / Melinda Day5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-20vs Stay LocalWon 20
W#1 DoublesMiranda Hoover / Kristina Peterson vs Tami DeGrosky / Lynette Krause6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelly Milligan / Shelby Johnson-sapp vs Stephanie Brennan / Cathleen French6-3, 6-4
2026-07-19vs Stay LocalWon 10
W#1 DoublesMiranda Hoover / Kristina Peterson vs Lynette Krause / Alexa Halaby6-4, 7-6
2026-07-17vs Stay LocalWon 10
W#1 DoublesMiranda Hoover / Kristina Peterson vs Alexa Halaby / Lynette Krause6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2026-07-12vs Jackson best shotsLost 03
L#1 DoublesCaroline Baker / Miranda Hoover vs Jenny May / Cheri Witz4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiane McGee / Sarah Kilmain vs Linda Merigliano / Mimi Freymann1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAna Chapman / Kelly Milligan vs Laura Egerter / Stephanie Roche1-6, 1-6
2026-07-10vs Stay LocalWon 20
W#1 DoublesMiranda Hoover / Kristina Peterson vs Alexa Halaby / Lynette Krause6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKelly Milligan / Emily Kirk vs Lindsay Brandenburg / Cathleen French6-4, 6-4
2026-07-10vs Jackson best shotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaroline Baker / Miranda Hoover vs Heather Silverman / Jenny May3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDiane McGee / Sarah Kilmain vs Cheri Witz / Linda Merigliano6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLucy Emhardt / Suzanne Watts vs Laura Egerter / Stephanie Roche2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Jackson Women 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Caroline Baker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Miranda Hoover
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Sarah Kilmain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Diane McGee
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.42
Tami DeGrosky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Kelly Milligan
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.03
Ana Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Suzanne Watts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lucy Emhardt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miranda Hoover + Caroline Baker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Caroline Baker
0W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4
Miranda Hoover
29W–16L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Sarah Kilmain
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Diane McGee
7W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Tami DeGrosky
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Kelly Milligan
38W–35L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Ana Chapman
11W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Suzanne Watts
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.96
Lucy Emhardt
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.