Teams

HBSQ-Millertime

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-23vs TCSP-Alleycats-MurchLost 23
W#1 DoublesApril Thompson / Sarah Boland vs Laura Hanson Morgan / Sarah Holt6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesShawn Thornsberry vs Pamela Schwartz5-7, 2-4
W#2 DoublesSusan James / Kathryn Strecker vs Katie Traverse / Maura Dunn6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCarin Weiss vs Amy Knobbs1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Matysik / Tammy Miller vs Heather Murch / Pey-Lin Carroll6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-06-16vs BC-BlochLost 14
L#1 DoublesMona Carter / Anna Matysik vs Shawna Dash / Jill Hancock2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesApril Thompson vs Jennifer Gardner6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathryn Strecker / Susan James vs Susan Hansen / Stacy Mathers4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSarah Boland vs Eileen Wang6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarole Gerber / Shawn Thornsberry vs Lisa Cheung / Christine Bloch1-6, 3-6
2021-06-08vs BAIN-Play It Forward-SunshineLost 14
W#1 DoublesApril Thompson / Mona Carter vs Emma Scanlan Dressler / Kirsty Ausmeier7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSarah Boland vs Emily Wooton0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan James / Kathryn Strecker vs Tyra Heatherington / Jennifer Easley2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesShawn Thornsberry vs Rachael Alnwick4-6, 5-5
L#3 DoublesTammy Miller / Stephanie Park vs Sarah Taylor / Rebecca Whitlock0-6, 0-6
2021-06-02vs CP-OttesenWon 41
W#1 DoublesAnna Matysik / Mona Carter vs Annie Ottesen / Constance Essinger6-4, 6-6
W#1 SinglesApril Thompson vs Lisa Kerslake6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan James / Kathryn Strecker vs Charlotte Flanagan / Amy Galanes6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCarin Weiss vs Ok Clark6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCarole Gerber / Erin Vikstrom vs Susan Bergeson / Mingming Zhan4-6, 2-6
2021-05-25vs BC-NewmanLost 23
W#1 DoublesMona Carter / Anna Matysik vs Betsy Chamberlin / Jeanie van Amen6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesApril Thompson vs Shari Ojendyk6-7, 3-4
L#2 DoublesSusan James / Kathryn Strecker vs Juiling Edmonds / Grace Newman4-6, 1-2
L#2 SinglesErin Vikstrom vs Camille Elliott1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Park / Tammy Miller vs Monica Gianni / Silke Reavis2-6, 2-6
2021-05-21vs RBW-String Theory 2-GibsonLost 23
L#1 DoublesKathryn Strecker / Susan James vs Dawn Williams / Elena Ivanova2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesApril Thompson vs Heather Mathews7-5, 4-4
L#2 DoublesMona Carter / Shawn Thornsberry vs Hiroko Komiya / Maren Gibson4-6, 4-5
W#2 SinglesSarah Boland vs Amely Wurmbrand7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTammy Miller / Erin Vikstrom vs Jo Gartenberg / Karen Sparks2-6, 1-6
2021-05-04Lost 14
L#1 DoublesSusan James / Hui Hong vs Dawn Apacible / Ursula Heenan5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesShawn Thornsberry vs Anna Ruffini1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMelody McGowan / Mona Carter vs Aliya Khan / Ginny Larsen4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesSarah Boland vs Renee Sedghinasab6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnna Matysik / Tammy Miller vs Jacky Grotle / Jacque Cao1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-04-28vs PL-Vamos! Team PreciadoWon 41
L#1 DoublesSarah Boland / Mona Carter vs Marisa Preciado / Nicolle Sherwood4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesApril Thompson vs Carol LaMoria6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAnna Matysik / Hui Hong vs Nicole Rhea / Melissa Bode3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesShawn Thornsberry vs Kriss Wells6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathryn Strecker / Susan James vs Cheryl Wate / Mary Lane6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings40 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC-Pham 3.0W80301023253
2RBW-Wyman8031923246
3AYTC-Serve Us a Double-Zakahi7134616210
4MI-Serve-Aces & Limes-Shea7132821257
5FC-Basha Tennis-Price71281225282
6TCSP-Alleycats-Murch71261433310
7AYTC-Super Bueno-Low62291123257
8ETC-Anderson62291127284
9TCSP-Smash-Reudink62291128251
10ETC-Sharks-Daniels62301029298
11BAIN-Play It Forward-Sunshine62241639332
12CP-Simply Smashing-Darrow53261429267
13STC-Ace of Base-Baker53251531292
14CP-Central Perk-Wong53241635305
15WSC-Buck Wild53221838323
16ETC-Team Serve It Up-Swiftney53221841356
17TCSP-Smash Girls-Volk53211942347
18RBW-String Theory 2-Gibson44211939329
19PL-Vamos! Team Preciado44211943332
20ETC-No Strings Attached-Janson44202043329
21BTA-Rotival44202044382
22CAC/SL-NetNuts-Rauen35221841305
23ETC-Slice Girls-Larsen35192143349
24BC-Wilwerding35192148362
25BETC-Grove/Ikeda35192150389
26TCSP-Net Gain-Saddler35182251364
27TCSP-Vogel26172348395
28AYTC (OUTDOORS) Team Golden26152552395
29BC-Newman26103053393
30HBSQ-Millertime26172354388
31MI-Brant26152554374
32ETC-Double The Fun-Smith26122855384
33MC W 3.0 Jay26132758390
34BETC-Smash It-Truong26103065435
35AYTC-Team Awesome Fun-Lu/Lusty17103062409
36TCSP-Netchix-Swanson1793164429
37BC-McLemore1783266401
38TCSP-Lesirge/Smith1783266434
39CAC/SL-Wonder Women-Miller0853569446
40WSC-Party at the Net-Krammer0863471445

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Alissa Seiple
published 3.5
3.12
April Thompson
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.86
Anna Matysik
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Hui Hong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Kathryn Strecker
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.66
Erin Vikstrom
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.65
Susan James
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.40
Carin Weiss
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.33
Tammy Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Melody McGowan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mona Carter
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Sarah Boland
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Shawn Thornsberry
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 0
Stephanie Park
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Miller + Mona Carter3351% games+5.5% vs expected
Sarah Boland + April Thompson5357% games−0.7% vs expected
Hui Hong + Anna Matysik4356% games−4.7% vs expected
Kathryn Strecker + Susan James262450% games−6.5% vs expected
Tammy Miller + Anna Matysik1536% games−15.0% vs expected
Mona Carter + Anna Matysik224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alissa Seiple
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
April Thompson
45W–36L career · 7 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Anna Matysik
57W–52L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Hui Hong
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Kathryn Strecker
39W–41L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Erin Vikstrom
18W–33L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.66
3
Susan James
43W–47L career · 8 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
2.5
Carin Weiss
21W–45L career · 2 lines in 2021
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Tammy Miller
13W–32L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%91%9%
2.33
Melody McGowan
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Mona Carter
13W–18L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Boland
18W–15L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Shawn Thornsberry
63W–55L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephanie Park
7W–18L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.