Teams

Aulisa

Combo · 7.5 Mens

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-20vs RobbinsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarson Smith / John Kyle Wooldridge vs Randy Robbins / Spencer Smith6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKeith Dixon / John Chad Carter vs Trevas Cruz / Jamie Rendon3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRocco Testini / John Gardner vs Jaime Ayala / Christopher Gregorcyk6-2, 6-3
2026-08-13vs RobbinsLost 12
W#1 DoublesKeith Dixon / Salomon Oliveros Parra vs Jaime Ayala / Christopher Gregorcyk6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCarson Smith / Eugenio Aulisa vs Tales Vieira / Hayden Farquhar6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRocco Testini / AJ Funk vs Trevas Cruz / Alexander Blake3-6, 4-6
2026-08-06vs RobbinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesRocco Testini / Salomon Oliveros Parra vs Trevas Cruz / Alexander Blake2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarson Smith / AJ Funk vs Lonnie Williams / Jamie Rendon6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKeith Dixon / John Kyle Wooldridge vs Hayden Farquhar / Tales Vieira6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Mens
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Robbins21451090
2Aulisa1254977

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Keith Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Rocco Testini
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
John Chad Carter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
John Kyle Wooldridge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
AJ Funk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Eugenio Aulisa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Salomon Oliveros Parra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eugenio Aulisa + John Chad Carter314 matchesnot enough data
Rocco Testini + Salomon Oliveros Parra134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keith Dixon
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Rocco Testini
10W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
3.59
John Chad Carter
36W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
John Kyle Wooldridge
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
AJ Funk
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Eugenio Aulisa
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Salomon Oliveros Parra
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.