Teams

Tichacek (Dante Fascell)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Spring - Night · 3.5 Adult 18 & over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-05-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAnders Madsen / Mike Tichacek vs Joseph Casal / Junya Okamoto1-6, 1-6
2023-04-27Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMike Tichacek vs Michael Goldner0-6, 0-6
2023-04-13vs Tennis Addicts (Tamiami Park)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEDUARDO RIOS / Alejandro Sananez vs David Pulido / Adrian Ledo3-6, 1-6
2023-04-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEDUARDO RIOS / Alejandro Sananez vs GABRIEL MERE / Angel Vargas6-7, 2-6
2023-03-02vs Leon (Deering Bay)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAnders Madsen / Mike Tichacek vs Guilherme Das Neves / GERARDO MARGOLIS1-6, 0-6
2023-02-16vs Trespalacios (Riviera Prep)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSantiago Eljaiek III / Mike Tichacek vs Alec Acosta / CESAR FLORIN1-6, 5-7
2023-02-09Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMike Tichacek vs Antonio Junco1-6, 0-6
2023-02-02vs Miami-Dade/Sengupta/18&over3.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmilio Zapata / Alejandro Sananez vs Victor Cuesta / Jaime Sanchez6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-01-26vs Vitello (Doral Park)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesEDUARDO RIOS / Alejandro Sananez vs Armando Iglesias / Mario Vitiello4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMike Tichacek vs Carmine Minichino1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMike Tichacek vs William Diez4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJuan de la Madriz / Alejandro Sananez vs Luis Lamas A / Arturo Moratinos4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Lawrence Chen
published
3.32
Andres Herrera
published 3.5
3.15
Alejandro Sananez
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Anders Madsen
published 3.5
2.57
Mike Tichacek
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
EDUARDO RIOS
published
Emilio Zapata
published
Jesse Jones
published
Juan de la Madriz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Tichacek + Alejandro Sananez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lawrence Chen
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Andres Herrera
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Alejandro Sananez
47W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Anders Madsen
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Mike Tichacek
298W–203L career · 7 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.57
EDUARDO RIOS
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Emilio Zapata
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jesse Jones
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Juan de la Madriz
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.