← Teams

THPRD-Soiffer

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.81 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Patrick Harkin
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.74
Karen Dellinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Donna Kennish
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.52
Flor Harrigan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.46
Neil Soiffer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Joe Entler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Steven Keo
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Kirk Planck
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
—
Deanna Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results8 ties
2022-05-15Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJulie Hansen / Patrick Harkin vs Tim Brink / Kathleen Budnick6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesFlor Harrigan / Deepak Kumar vs Michael Yee / Jana Hirst2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngie Lee / Steven Keo vs Gerald Chase / Bonnie Sidoff6-2, 6-0
2022-05-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Flor Harrigan vs Claire Thayer / Matt Thayer6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Hansen / Steven Keo vs Judith Kobin / Brad Boynton4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeanna Peterson / Kirk Planck vs Sibyl Jarrett / Matt Bolte6-1, 7-6
2022-05-01Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Donna Kennish vs William Haynes / Karen Pickering6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSteven Keo / Julie Hansen vs John Varner / RENEE VANDEGRIEND6-3, 6-1
2022-04-24Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesFlor Harrigan / Patrick Harkin vs Claire Thayer / Matt Thayer6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKirk Planck / Karen Dellinger vs Judith Kobin / Jim Borell6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSteven Keo / Angie Lee vs Naomi Steinberg / Philip Chen6-2, 6-2
2022-04-16Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Karen Dellinger vs Tony Moreno / Liz DelPlato6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSteven Keo / Donna Kennish vs Dave Vinik / Penny Birkhofer7-5, 6-3
2022-04-15Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Flor Harrigan vs Kim Wright / David White6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKirk Planck / Karen Dellinger vs Dana McKillop / Zachary Wright1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-10Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Donna Kennish vs Tony Khamsouk / Katherine Kralj6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Flor Harrigan vs Tony Moreno / Liz DelPlato3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-20Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Karen Dellinger vs Michael Yee / Jana Hirst6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Julie Hansen vs Rick Wong / Lydia Smith6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJoe Entler / Deanna Peterson vs Mary Sides / Perry Sides7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Patrick Harkin
88W–69L career
not enough data
—
4
Karen Dellinger
141W–68L career
1%99%0%
3.74
4
Donna Kennish
137W–120L career
23%77%0%
3.54
4
Flor Harrigan
80W–73L career
25%75%0%
3.52
4
Neil Soiffer
96W–138L career
44%56%0%
3.46
3.5
Joe Entler
28W–42L career
0%89%11%
3.43
3.5
Steven Keo
45W–44L career
0%97%3%
3.35
3.5
Kirk Planck
91W–71L career
6%94%0%
3.15
0
Deanna Peterson
9W–22L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.