Teams

Feather Sound Dikmen

2025 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 M Saturday

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-21vs Tarpon Net NinjasWon 10
W#2 DoublesRay Baker / Brian Duncan vs Matthew Johns / Bernardo Perez de Lara6-3, 6-3
2025-06-07vs Pinellas/Dsa/40&Over3.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Duncan / Mark Higgins vs James Bettencourt / Kevin Dooling1-6, 2-6
2025-05-17vs SPTC Holliday 3.5MWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Baragar / Brian Duncan vs WAYNE SMITH / David Lesser6-3, 6-1
2025-05-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Dikmen / Brian Duncan vs Robert Hill / Dan McMullen5-7, 3-6
2025-04-26vs RCSP FantauzzoLost 04
L#1 DoublesRay Baker / Brandon Congleton vs Alan Chin / Barry Michael6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDavid Dikmen vs Dustin Applebaum2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRandy Kane / John Baragar vs Daniel Lee / Kevin Hennessy2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Kurella / Mark Higgins vs Franklin Boyd / Jason Brayer2-6, 0-6
2025-04-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Dikmen / Brian Duncan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-05vs Tarpon Net NinjasLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Dikmen / Mark Higgins vs Jose H Salazar / Bernardo Perez de Lara2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Baragar vs Shawn Edelman3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRay Baker / Dean Bartles vs Robert B Buckner / Don Porter6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Ray Baker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Brandon Congleton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Brian Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
John Baragar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.06
David Dikmen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Dean Bartles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Thomas Kurella
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ray Baker
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Brandon Congleton
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Brian Duncan
42W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Baragar
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
David Dikmen
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Dean Bartles
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Thomas Kurella
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.