Teams

OC LNRC - Sherry

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Ames Blas
published 4
3.93
Meera Shier
published 4
3.92
Abigail Knopf
published 4.5
3.84
Luna Qingyue Cai
published
3.82
Stephanie Tarzia
published
3.79
Amy Berk
published 4
Gina Christian
published 4
3.55
Stacy Ison
published
3.51
Libby Perry
published
3.49
Mona Karram
published
3.41
Alma Bautista
published 4
Afsaneh Taghavi
published 3.5
Celine Liebrecht
published 3.5
Pamela Herr
published
Sue Littman
published
Sueann Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luna Qingyue Cai + Abigail Knopf033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ames Blas
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Meera Shier
64W–51L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.93
4.5
Abigail Knopf
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.92
Luna Qingyue Cai
10W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
Stephanie Tarzia
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
3.82
4
Amy Berk
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Gina Christian
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacy Ison
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Libby Perry
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
Mona Karram
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
4
Alma Bautista
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Afsaneh Taghavi
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Celine Liebrecht
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Herr
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sue Littman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sueann Jones
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.