Teams

Cottonwood-Haverkost/Nielsen

2026 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 3.5W

15 players · average NTRP 3.31 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SM-Harris & the Serve-Ivors000000
2Sports Mall-Finlay000000
3Liberty Park-Causing a Racquet000000
4Park City MARC-Krueger/Siano000000
5SLTHC-Bayna000000
6Cottonwood-Haverkost/Nielsen000000
7SLTHC-Haroldsen/Leatham000000
8Liberty Park-Prince-Hagood/Kesler000000
9Trentman000000
10SunPro Advantage000000
11Spencer000000
12Sports Mall-Stroud-Peterson/Farr000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Taylor Haverkost
published 3.5
3.40
Lori Carter
published
3.26
Lora Lyon
published
3.25
Jane Woolley
published
3.14
Dawn Farrell
published 3.5
3.09
Kerry Davis
published
3.09
Phyllis Capp
published 3.5
3.01
Jamuna Nielsen
published 3.5
2.94
Katie Winson
published 3.5
2.88
Melissa Child
published 3
2.77
2.69
Mikelle Moore
published 3
2.54
Kate Hazelwood
published
Jazmin Asmar
published
Tam Pham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Davis + Lori Carter5260% games+12.0% vs expected
Katie Winson + Taylor Haverkost4170% games+8.5% vs expected
Krissie Summerhays + Lora Lyon2747% games+6.1% vs expected
Taylor Haverkost + Lori Carter15660% games+3.6% vs expected
Jamuna Nielsen + Melissa Child3449% games+3.6% vs expected
Mikelle Moore + Melissa Child13952% games+2.5% vs expected
Jamuna Nielsen + Lori Carter6163% games+0.9% vs expected
Jamuna Nielsen + Kerry Davis3248% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Taylor Haverkost
138W–62L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Lori Carter
107W–54L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Lora Lyon
101W–81L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Jane Woolley
77W–34L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Dawn Farrell
127W–111L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Kerry Davis
35W–30L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Phyllis Capp
35W–42L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Jamuna Nielsen
126W–120L career · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Katie Winson
128W–122L career · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Melissa Child
73W–73L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Krissie Summerhays
109W–122L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Mikelle Moore
46W–52L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Kate Hazelwood
10W–11L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Jazmin Asmar
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tam Pham
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.