Teams

Link - RS Hard

2025 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Combo 18 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 2.67 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-18vs Meekins - RS HardLost 02
L#1 DoublesPercy Rojas / Zach Pohlmann vs Xiaobo Dong / Robert Landt2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJason Twigg / Jody Link vs John Haarala / Matthew Meekins2-6, 1-6
2025-11-20vs Meekins - RS HardLost 03
L#1 DoublesBradford Grimmel / Rick Greene vs Joseph Tegenkamp / John Haarala2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJody Link / Zach Pohlmann vs Jack Bellah / Matthew Meekins4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMike Esmonde / Bud Lawrence vs Robert Landt / Joe Burch7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-10-30vs Meekins - RS HardLost 12
L#1 DoublesBradford Grimmel / Bud Lawrence vs Ryan Worley / Jack Bellah3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJonathan Llanera / Brian Young vs Joseph Tegenkamp / Xiaobo Dong3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesZach Pohlmann / Rick Greene vs Robert Landt / Chris Kelly6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Combo 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Zach Pohlmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Jonathan Llanera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Bradford Grimmel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Brian Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.70
Mike Esmonde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Jason Twigg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Jody Link
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Bud Lawrence
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Percy Rojas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rick Greene
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Young + Rick Greene224 matchesnot enough data
Zach Pohlmann + Bradford Grimmel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zach Pohlmann
13W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
Jonathan Llanera
22W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Bradford Grimmel
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
2.5
Brian Young
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%3%97%
2.75
Mike Esmonde
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Jason Twigg
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.62
Jody Link
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43
2.5
Bud Lawrence
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Percy Rojas
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rick Greene
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.