Teams

Redding/White 65s 6.5 Combo W Mon AM

2025 Piedmont Combo 65 & Over · 6.5 Women 65 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-05vs Cober 65s 6.5 Combo W Mon AMLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Zuraw / Michelle Shoemaker vs Emily Crenshaw / Denise Fiery6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBetty Haggard / Margaret Lynde-Rhyne vs Allison Waddell / Meredith Patterson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMissy Chance / Janet Gorham vs Ginny Nelson / Spoma Jovanovic3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesSue White / Margret Padgett vs Noreena Cole / Christine Osteen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-08vs Cober 65s 6.5 Combo W Mon AMWon 21
W#1 DoublesBetty Haggard / Dana Marpoe vs Ann PORTER / Emily Crenshaw6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Lynde-Rhyne / Gloria Eckman vs Spoma Jovanovic / Betsy Wood6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathy Chinnis / Janet Gorham vs Robin Smith / Ginny Nelson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMargret Padgett / Dana Marpoe vs Margaret Reynolds / Patricia Barman4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesGloria Eckman / Janet Craft vs Noreena Cole / Grace Titzer3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMissy Chance / Janet Gorham vs Joyce Chamblee / Kathy Jones2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Chinnis / Eleanor Redding vs Sue Ann Lapp / Teresa Dail4-6, 1-6
2025-08-11vs Cober 65s 6.5 Combo W Mon AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesDana Marpoe / Margret Padgett vs Denise Fiery / Emily Crenshaw4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMargret Padgett / Janet Craft vs Patty Dutton / Faye Halvorsen6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Dana Marpoe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.24
Kathy Chinnis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Ann Zuraw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Debra Hendricks
published 3.5
2.94
Betty Haggard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Michelle Shoemaker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Margret Padgett
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Missy Chance
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Sue White
published
2.84
Eleanor Redding
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Margaret Lynde-Rhyne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Susan Wrenn
published
Gloria Eckman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Janet Gorham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue White + Margaret Lynde-Rhyne033 matchesnot enough data
Eleanor Redding + Kathy Chinnis033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dana Marpoe
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
Kathy Chinnis
17W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Ann Zuraw
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Debra Hendricks
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Betty Haggard
5W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Michelle Shoemaker
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Margret Padgett
41W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Missy Chance
13W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
Sue White
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Eleanor Redding
5W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Margaret Lynde-Rhyne
19W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Susan Wrenn
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Gloria Eckman
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Gorham
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.