Teams

Wofford

2022 Anne Arundel Adult Other Women's Day · Anne Arundel Adult Other Women's Day 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-29vs HuntingtonLost 01
L#2 DoublesDale Clark / Cynthia Wofford vs Jill Huntington / Sumiyo McShea1-6, 2-6
2022-03-23vs AppelSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Grignon / Teresa Taylor vs Lisa Walsh / Anh Le2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCornelia Wikar / Cynthia Wofford vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-17vs AppelLost 01
L#1 DoublesTeresa Taylor / Cynthia Wofford vs Jennifer Coady / Anh Le0-6, 2-6
2022-03-15vs HuntingtonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJulie Grignon / Ruth Popp vs Jennifer Mcgowan / Babette Poyer6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCynthia Wofford / Nancy McGee vs Jill Huntington / Sarah Worcester0-6, 4-6
2022-03-02vs AppelSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Grignon / Sherri Raimondo vs Lisa Walsh / Sophia Crawley6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Herman / Cynthia Wofford vs Tracy Seybert / Marina Anglim2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-02-22vs HuntingtonLost 01
L#3 DoublesTeresa Taylor / Cynthia Wofford vs Jennifer Mcgowan / Patricia Lopez1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-02-01vs HuntingtonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJulie Grignon / Jennifer Sapp vs Sumiyo McShea / Karen Adriani2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCynthia Wofford / Nancy McGee vs Karen Kirksey / Rise Lancoon6-3, 6-1
2022-01-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesCynthia Wofford / Teresa Taylor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-11vs HuntingtonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Grignon / Sherri Raimondo vs Jill Huntington / Sumiyo McShea5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDale Clark / Cynthia Wofford vs Rise Lancoon / Kathy Hastings6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult Other Women's Day 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Dale Clark
published 3.5
3.05
Cynthia Wofford
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.88
Julie Grignon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.39
Kim Herman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Grignon + Cynthia Wofford134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dale Clark
19W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3
Cynthia Wofford
180W–137L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Julie Grignon
86W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.88
Kim Herman
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
0%81%19%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.