Teams

Marion/Schappell

2026 Marion Adult 55 & Over Winter · 8.0 W Saturday

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-29vs FK Paris - BarletWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Armagost / Mime Ichini-Lurie vs Heidi Yates / Marlene Townsend6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaryn Dolan / Patty Swanson vs Christine Padron / Lynn Godwin6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Jones / Dina Sapienza vs Bonnie Keating / Beatrice Barlet6-7, 2-6
2026-03-21vs FK Walsh 8Won 21
L#1 DoublesRene Stinnett / Yvonne Schappell vs Cheryl Brent / Mary Jeanne Walsh5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Miluk / Michelle Nathan vs Susan Garrick / Jill Kimball6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBeverly Gates / Patti Hischmann vs Valerie Elvin / Diane Stablein2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-07vs SkyviewWon 21
W#1 DoublesMime Ichini-Lurie / Yvonne Schappell vs Ellen Barnes / Katja Morris6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Armagost / Karyn Dolan vs Peggy Ridgway / Rayetta Spina4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Jones / Nancy Rushman vs Pamelia Payne / Helen Sweeney6-7, 2-6
2026-02-21vs FK CentonzeWon 30
W#1 DoublesMime Ichini-Lurie / Rene Stinnett vs Beth Riendeau / Kay Conway6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNancy Rushman / Kelly Armagost vs Gwenda Ward / Kimberly Scudder Thompson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaryn Dolan / Yvonne Schappell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-14vs FK Walsh 8Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Nathan / Michelle Miluk vs Lisa Degirolami / Jill Kimball6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesElaine Parker / Patty Swanson vs Cheryl Brent / Mary Jeanne Walsh4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBeverly Gates / Dina Sapienza vs Susan Garrick / Wendy MacMurray3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-08vs FK CentonzeWon 21
W#1 DoublesMime Ichini-Lurie / Kelly Armagost vs Beth Riendeau / Susan Atwell7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDina Sapienza / Elaine Parker vs Nancy Little / Pamela Plumlee0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPatti Hischmann / Linda Jones vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-07vs FK Paris - BarletWon 30
W#1 DoublesYvonne Schappell / Mime Ichini-Lurie vs Judy Hoops / Elizabeth Bosco6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Nathan / Michelle Miluk vs Julie Haynes / Bonnie Keating6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Rushman / Patty Swanson vs Terry Shick / Diane Cassidy6-1, 6-3
2026-01-30vs SkyviewWon 21
W#1 DoublesMime Ichini-Lurie / Rene Stinnett vs Ellen Barnes / Debra Malone6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesYvonne Schappell / Kelly Armagost vs Sarah Collinson / Katja Morris2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatti Hischmann / Beverly Gates vs Pamelia Payne / Helen Sweeney3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Michelle Miluk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
Mime Ichini-Lurie
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.92
Yvonne Schappell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.82
Karyn Dolan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Rene Stinnett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Beverly Gates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Kelly Armagost
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.71
Linda Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Nancy Rushman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Patty Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Michelle Nathan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Elaine Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Dina Sapienza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Patti Hischmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Miluk + Michelle Nathan4159% gamesnot enough data
Mime Ichini-Lurie + Yvonne Schappell404 matchesnot enough data
Patty Swanson + Mime Ichini-Lurie213 matchesnot enough data
Mime Ichini-Lurie + Kelly Armagost213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Armagost + Karyn Dolan123 matchesnot enough data
Yvonne Schappell + Rene Stinnett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Miluk
133W–90L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
Mime Ichini-Lurie
94W–72L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Yvonne Schappell
131W–57L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
Karyn Dolan
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
Rene Stinnett
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Beverly Gates
30W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Kelly Armagost
12W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
Linda Jones
24W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
Nancy Rushman
33W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.66
Patty Swanson
31W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Michelle Nathan
41W–42L career · 6 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Elaine Parker
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
4
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
Patti Hischmann
23W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.