Teams

Buchanan/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.5 Men 18 & over

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-08vs LaBonia/MemphisWon 32
W#1 DoublesGriffin Beard / Chad Rounder vs Henry Stratton / Gabe LaBonia6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTaylor Lackie vs Jamie Marszalek6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRichmond Poindexter / Jack Stimac vs David Patterson / Bret Boscaccy6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMarq Cobb vs Kevin Tikhomroff3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Sheahan / Michael Moore vs Brice Bailey / Thomas Bateman6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Richmond Poindexter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Jack Stimac
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Albert Kuhlo
published 3.5
3.40
George Edwards
published
3.36
Griffin Beard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Taylor Lackie
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.27
Benjamin Jagoe
published 3.5
3.25
Dusty Nelson
published
3.23
William Lancaster
published
3.23
John Sheahan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Barrett Day
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Baker Williams
published 3.5
3.15
Ben Avant
published 3.5
3.12
Chad Rounder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Gregory Gaston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Marq Cobb
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jack Stimac + Griffin Beard213 matchesnot enough data
John Sheahan + Benjamin Jagoe303 matchesnot enough data
Dusty Nelson + Barrett Day303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richmond Poindexter
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Jack Stimac
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Albert Kuhlo
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
George Edwards
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Griffin Beard
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Taylor Lackie
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Benjamin Jagoe
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Dusty Nelson
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
William Lancaster
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
John Sheahan
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Barrett Day
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Baker Williams
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Ben Avant
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Chad Rounder
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Gregory Gaston
12W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Marq Cobb
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.