Teams

ESB:Double Trouble:Webster/Smith

2024 VT Adult 18 & Over Flex Women's Doubles · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-27vs ESB:BABS:SinopoliLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaja Smith / Liza Webster vs Marsha Weisfeld / Nicole Hansen2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-21vs ESB:Lobsters:Ruwet/GaidaWon 10
W#1 DoublesEvelyn Norris / Lisa Merrill vs Gini Park / Gretchen Gaida Michaels6-1, 6-4
2024-07-19vs ESP:Volley Girls:SmithWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Merrill / Evelyn Norris vs Mary Beth Pinard / Kristin Walsh3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-30vs ESB:BABS:SinopoliWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Merrill / Evelyn Norris vs Lori Durieux / Alexa Mann6-2, 6-4
2024-06-28vs ESB:Lobsters:Ruwet/GaidaLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Merrill / Maja Smith vs Megan OBrien / Gini Park3-6, 2-6
2024-06-23vs ESP:Volley Girls:SmithLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Morton / Evelyn Norris vs Carolyn Fitzgerald / Kate Cunningham0-6, 0-1
2024-06-16vs ESB:BABS:SinopoliWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Merrill / Evelyn Norris vs Alexa Mann / Marsha Weisfeld6-2, 6-0
2024-06-08vs ESB:Lobsters:Ruwet/GaidaWon 10
W#1 DoublesEvelyn Norris / Maja Smith vs Gini Park / Gretchen Gaida Michaels6-1, 7-6
2024-05-18vs ESP:Volley Girls:SmithLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Merrill / Liza Webster vs Kate Cunningham / Kristin Walsh6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ESP:Volley Girls:Smith6363667
2ESB:Double Trouble:Webster/Smith5454978
3ESB:BABS:Sinopoli45451388
4ESB:Lobsters:Ruwet/Gaida36361497

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Maja Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Morton
published 3
2.74
Lisa Merrill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Evelyn Norris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Liza Webster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Merrill + Evelyn Norris7356% games+8.5% vs expected
Maja Smith + Evelyn Norris4452% games−5.7% vs expected
Lisa Merrill + Maja Smith2741% gamesnot enough data
Liza Webster + Maja Smith134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maja Smith
20W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Elizabeth Morton
no matches on record · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Merrill
29W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Evelyn Norris
19W–32L career · 6 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
2.63
Liza Webster
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.