Teams

Tirado (Salvadore Park)

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 3.5 Adult Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Elise Benkard
published
3.44
Gina Bruce
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Karen Nunes
published
3.28
Ana Tirado
published 3.5
3.24
Jessica Moore
published
3.16
Carla Rebak
published 3.5
3.14
Nicole Kasten
published
3.10
Paulina Escalante
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #4 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.08
Denise Beauvois
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Cecilia Russell
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Veronica Hernandez
published
2.97
Nancy Ney
published
2.95
2.93
2.82
Luanne Schulz
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
2.73
Lourdes Akers
published
2.62
Theresa Alonso
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Nunes + Ana Tirado101151% games+2.5% vs expected
Ana Tirado + Elise Benkard3450% games+1.9% vs expected
Jessica Moore + Ana Tirado1445% games−1.6% vs expected
Gina Bruce + Jessica Moore4448% games−8.7% vs expected
Cecilia Russell + Denise Beauvois92240% games−10.2% vs expected
Nicole Kasten + Jessica Moore224 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Moore + Veronica Hernandez044 matchesnot enough data
Denise Beauvois + Carla Rebak213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elise Benkard
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Gina Bruce
85W–58L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Karen Nunes
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Ana Tirado
17W–24L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Jessica Moore
26W–31L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Carla Rebak
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Nicole Kasten
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Paulina Escalante
153W–174L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Denise Beauvois
27W–76L career · 6 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Cecilia Russell
53W–76L career · 8 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Veronica Hernandez
8W–29L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Nancy Ney
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Eulalia Salas-Egoavil
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
Mariagrazia Salvador
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.93
3
Luanne Schulz
51W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Maria Carolina Perera
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Lourdes Akers
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Theresa Alonso
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.