Teams

KDavis/ABroemel (Queens)

2025 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 3.0 - Thurs PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-17vs KKlug (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Broemel / Zack Johnson vs Stacey Herndon / Dwayne Trantham5-7, 3-6
2025-07-03vs AAltamura/LDragon (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAllison Broemel / Zack Johnson vs Alaina Altamura / Dominic Ferraro6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-26vs KCronin/KChapman (Piper Glen)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAllison Broemel / Aaron Foreman vs Kenneth Godfrey / Kathy Harborne4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesZack Johnson / Krystal Carmichael vs Kris Chapman / Sarah Garner6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAllison Broemel / Aaron Foreman vs Melodie Ohaus / Brandon Bissinnar6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-05vs KGibson (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesZack Johnson / Krystal Carmichael vs Lauren Humphries / Chris Rowe6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 3.0 - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Emilia Anderson
published
3.00
Kelsey Davis
published
2.94
Allison Broemel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Aaron Foreman
published 3
2.80
Lincoln Eppard
published 3
2.78
Victoria Brokaw
published
2.76
Parker Andrews
published 3
2.75
Krystal Carmichael
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Stephanie Qunbar
published
2.56
Lindsay Fleharty
published
Linnea Jurs
published
Zack Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linnea Jurs + Parker Andrews213 matchesnot enough data
Allison Broemel + Aaron Foreman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emilia Anderson
37W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.05
Kelsey Davis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Allison Broemel
65W–92L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Aaron Foreman
5W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Lincoln Eppard
4W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Victoria Brokaw
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Parker Andrews
7W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Krystal Carmichael
28W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Stephanie Qunbar
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.59
Lindsay Fleharty
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
Linnea Jurs
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zack Johnson
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.