Teams

SATA/Marc Frischer

2025 · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 55 & Over (Men) - Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 55 & Over (Men) - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SATA/Marc Frischer7322823228
2The Landings - Griffin64201028254
3CRC - Bryant/Leone55121841298

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Francisco VAldez
usually #1 Doubles 61%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.39
Juan Avendano
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
3.38
Brad Sinoff
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Raul Buelvas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.31
Rich Greco
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Andrew Watson
published 3.5
3.20
Joel Solomon
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.19
James Grusheski
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Todd Swezey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.04
Marc Frischer
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.02
Clark Perry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Damino
published 3
Stephen Hopkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Grusheski + Brad Sinoff5352% games+6.5% vs expected
Francisco VAldez + Brad Sinoff5359% games+2.0% vs expected
Joel Solomon + Marc Frischer4354% games−1.5% vs expected
Juan Avendano + Francisco VAldez14954% games−1.6% vs expected
Todd Swezey + Brad Sinoff4260% gamesnot enough data
Raul Buelvas + Brad Sinoff224 matchesnot enough data
Rich Greco + Marc Frischer224 matchesnot enough data
Joel Solomon + James Grusheski224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Francisco VAldez
42W–36L career · 31 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
Juan Avendano
17W–13L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Brad Sinoff
29W–20L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Raul Buelvas
14W–7L career · 15 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Rich Greco
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Andrew Watson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Joel Solomon
23W–17L career · 14 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
James Grusheski
14W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Todd Swezey
13W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Marc Frischer
16W–25L career · 14 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Clark Perry
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
David Damino
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Hopkins
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.