Teams

ELW Hungiville

2022 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over Weekend Winter · 8.0 W Saturday

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-26vs Pinellas - SPTC/JohnsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Mary Jacobs vs Mary Miller / Patricia Beck6-3, 6-0
2022-03-23vs McMullen OonkSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Mary Jacobs vs Lisa Oonk / Karen Fischer6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Cheryll Carollo vs Holly Charles / Linda Thomson2-6, 5-7
2022-03-05vs Pinellas - SPTC/JohnsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Kathleen Annichiarico vs Mary Miller / Jaclyn Turner6-7, 5-7
2022-02-19vs McMullen OonkLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Kathleen Annichiarico vs Holly Charles / Tori Disalvio2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-02-12vs Pinellas - SPTC/JohnsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Wendy Unger vs Elizabeth Burdick / Ethel Murphy2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Cheryll Carollo vs Ellen Johnson / Lucy Robertson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-29vs McMullen OonkSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Wendy Unger vs Tori Disalvio / Deborah Golomb7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Christine Klanac vs Jennifer Bell / Linda Thomson2-6, 3-6
2022-01-22vs Pinellas - SPTC/JohnsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Kathleen Annichiarico vs Janet Matthews / Sandy Martin4-6, 2-6
2022-01-20vs McMullen OonkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Patricia Ryan vs Tori Disalvio / Deborah Golomb2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Wendy Unger vs Jean Cantu / Dorothy Crosse6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Michele Ironsmith
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.81
Cheryll Carollo
published 4
3.60
Mary Jacobs
published
3.30
Laura Hungiville
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.12
Cindi Crockett
published 3.5
Wendy Unger
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Ironsmith
158W–102L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
4.51
4
Cheryll Carollo
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Mary Jacobs
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Laura Hungiville
67W–119L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Cindi Crockett
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
Kathleen Annichiarico
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Unger
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.