← Teams

Bellone

2022 Coppermine Adult 40 & Over · Coppermine Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-16vs AkcamWon 1–0
W#1 DoublesJulie Snavely / Patricia Mutascio vs Maneesha Ahluwalia / Deidra Crews6-1, 7-6
2022-06-09vs AkcamLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJoy Kirk / Julie Snavely vs Tracy Flaherty / Nancy Der0-6, 2-6
2022-06-06vs FordLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Mutascio / Teresa McTeague vs Jennifer Lee / Brooke Davidson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-06-01Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesTeresa McTeague / Beth van Derslice vs Erica Johnson / Deidra Crews6-2, 6-3
2022-05-21vs FordLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTeresa McTeague / Julie Snavely vs Kimberly Ford / Eva Simmons-O'Brien4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Burnside / Patricia Mutascio vs Brooke Davidson / Jennifer Lee0-6, 1-6
2022-05-17vs AkcamLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJoan Royals / Patricia Mutascio vs Beyza Akcam / Nancy Der6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Korczakowski / Julie Snavely vs Sue Burdette / Tracy Flaherty2-6, 6-7
2022-05-13vs FordWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesJulie Snavely / Beth van Derslice vs Christina Makris / Sophia Dryer6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Beth van Derslice
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Patricia Mutascio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Julie Snavely
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Kelly Bellone
published —
3.10
Ashling Pollard
published 3.5
3.02
Donna Slaughter
published 3.5
2.91
Mina Horn
published —
2.90
Joy Kirk
published —
—
Heather Burnside
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Snavely + Patricia Mutascio4–1047% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth van Derslice
57W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Patricia Mutascio
16W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Julie Snavely
35W–79L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
—
Kelly Bellone
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Ashling Pollard
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Donna Slaughter
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
—
Mina Horn
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
2.91
—
Joy Kirk
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Heather Burnside
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.