Teams

River Hills - J. Caouette

2021 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 and Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.92 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-28Won 20
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Benelli / Christina Dorothy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlvin MacAsinag / Shannon Deck vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-03-24vs Buckhorn Why The Hell NotSplit 11
W#1 DoublesThinh Duong / Esthela Gonzalez vs Carlos Sanchez - (DQ) / Margarita Colon6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBen DeBrocke / Christina Dorothy vs Barry Cohen / Melanie Skinner7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesManuel Alvarez / Esthela Gonzalez vs Peter Marsocci / Casey Gates6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Benelli / Christina Dorothy vs Stephen McCormick / Brenda Kunkel6-2, 6-4
2021-02-14vs HCC - ArmagostLost 01
L#2 DoublesThinh Duong / Esthela Gonzalez vs Brad Armagost / Dina Caputa6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2021-01-31vs SVB - J. OrsiniWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Benelli / Christina Dorothy vs Raymond Haga / Karen Abrams6-3, 6-2
2021-01-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlvin MacAsinag / Jackie Caouette vs Nick Hardy / Cynthia Martinez3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-01-10vs Carrollwood Rec Center - S. RoySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlvin MacAsinag / Alejandra Sanderson vs Randolph Gibson / Rebecca Gibson6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Benelli / Christina Dorothy vs Roger Bensinger / Rhonda Mendoza6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Manuel Alvarez
published
4.33
Ignacio Molina
published 4.5
4.20
Christina Dorothy
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.69
Shannon Deck
published
3.64
Ben DeBrocke
published 4
3.36
Teresa Manganello
published
Alvin MacAsinag
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.21
Esthela Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Darla Jones
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Manuel Alvarez
23W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Ignacio Molina
16W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Christina Dorothy
134W–85L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
4.20
Shannon Deck
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Ben DeBrocke
7W–21L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
Teresa Manganello
3W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Alvin MacAsinag
53W–84L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Esthela Gonzalez
127W–148L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Darla Jones
67W–85L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.