Teams

RCC Ames 7.0

2025 Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-06vs Westwood Smith 7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesMary Tankersley / Michele Riedel vs Dianne Dementi / Betsy Holloway6-0, 6-1
2025-05-23vs Burkwood-Poehler 7.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesKelly Gregory / Catherine Fallin vs Mary Ann Cox / Frances Poehler6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Battle / Nancy Mihalko vs Virginia Bowie / Sandy Price6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-05-20vs Raintree Boomers - Stahling 7.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Valiquett / Nancy Mihalko vs Lisa Harmon / Kelly Smith7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Fallin / Diana Dull vs Barbara Portanova / Donna Moody6-0, 7-6
2025-05-16vs ACAC Larue 7.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesCatherine Fallin / Marykay Stainback vs Kathryn Williams / Patricia Bell6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Kathy Ames vs Judy Napier / Virginia Nelson7-5, 6-2
2025-05-02vs Westwood Smith 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesSheri Carlyle / Michele Riedel vs Lynda Smith / Kathryn Gray6-2, 6-2
2025-04-25vs Raintree Boomers - Stahling 7.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Kathy Ames vs Karen Solana / Sally Thomasson5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Battle / Catherine Fallin vs Lisa Harmon / Carolyn Moncure3-6, 5-7
2025-04-18vs Burkwood-Poehler 7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesMarykay Stainback / Michele Riedel vs Jane Colgin / Lisa Wylam6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Susan Valiquett vs Ellen Bedichek / Frances Poehler6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Nancy Mihalko
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.43
Susan Valiquett
published
3.41
Michele Riedel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Annie H Johnson
published 3.5
3.30
Diana Dull
published 3.5
3.28
Kathy Ames
published
3.26
Catherine Fallin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.23
Betsy Siewers
published 3.5
3.15
Kelly Gregory
published
3.12
Sheri Carlyle
published
2.96
Mary Tankersley
published
Linda Battle
published
Marykay Stainback
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Fallin + Michele Riedel111051% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nancy Mihalko
182W–108L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Susan Valiquett
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Michele Riedel
71W–114L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Annie H Johnson
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Diana Dull
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Kathy Ames
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Catherine Fallin
125W–165L career · 10 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Betsy Siewers
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kelly Gregory
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Sheri Carlyle
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.12
Mary Tankersley
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Linda Battle
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marykay Stainback
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.