Teams

7-SLantry-Eno

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women-Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-05-17vs 4-SHarvey-DFCWon 10
W#3 DoublesRebekah Schloemann / Carrie Guthrie vs Susie Post-Rust / Barbara Gillespie6-3, 6-2
2022-05-03vs 5-OGorbacheva-EnoWon 30
W#2 DoublesEmily Culbreth / Anna Koltchagova vs Anna Creissen / Elizabeth Harvie3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRebekah Schloemann vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristina Jenkins / Jessica Sherman vs Sheza Healey / Heather Herndon3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-28vs 3-LBolger-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristina Jenkins / Jessica Sherman vs Lauren Bolger / Sally Choi6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-21vs 1-ELinnander-EnoSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAnna Koltchagova vs Katie Naftel6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRochelle Grieco / Jessica Sherman vs Sallie Nowacek / Erika Linnander4-6, 0-6
2022-04-16vs 4-SHarvey-DFCWon 21
W#2 DoublesAnneliese Carr / Michelle Then vs Lori Hatlen / Susana Harvey6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAnna Koltchagova vs Sheron Parks6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRochelle Grieco / Rebekah Schloemann vs Amanda Lacoff / Jeanne Murray6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-14vs 6-SBaldwin-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnneliese Carr / Michelle Then vs Lynise Devance / Betsy Shane3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAnna Koltchagova vs Sarah Baldwin6-3, 6-0
2022-04-12vs 2-JRoss-EnoWon 21
W#2 DoublesAnna Koltchagova / Miranda Harmon vs Sharon Campbell / Elizabeth Heald4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJessica Sherman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRochelle Grieco / Christina Jenkins vs Lisa Buyaki / Cristina Smith2-6, 1-6
2022-03-31Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMallory Short / Anna Koltchagova vs Rosa Lopez Sanchez / Kristen Fuller6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-03-30vs 6-SBaldwin-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesJessica Sherman / Mallory Short vs Erin McAllister / Zana Piric4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Jenkins / Rebekah Schloemann vs Roberta Hadley / Kathryn Pollak0-6, 3-6
2022-03-22vs 1-ELinnander-EnoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChristina Jenkins / Jessica Sherman vs Amy Drew / Christine Sudzina Schut3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Culbreth / Anna Koltchagova vs Anne Stephens / Allison Stewart-Smull6-1, 6-4
2022-03-17vs 2-JRoss-EnoLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Koltchagova / Rochelle Grieco vs Heidi Ross / Lynsey Easley1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnneliese Carr / Michelle Then vs Zoe Dubrow - (DQ) / Maggie Wang2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Culbreth / Rebekah Schloemann vs Lisa Buyaki / Elizabeth Heald6-7, 6-7
2022-03-03vs 5-OGorbacheva-EnoWon 30
W#2 DoublesEmily Culbreth / Rochelle Grieco vs Heather Herndon / Judith Stewart6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAnna Koltchagova vs Lauren Triebert6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChristina Jenkins / Rebekah Schloemann vs Diane Adams / Sheza Healey1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Christina Jenkins
published 3.5
3.73
Jessica Sherman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.72
3.65
Michelle Then
published
3.60
Miranda Harmon
published
3.59
Rebekah Schloemann
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.52
Nicole Bullock
published
3.46
Anneliese Carr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Anna Koltchagova
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.41
Rochelle Grieco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Emily Culbreth
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rochelle Grieco + Anna Koltchagova7847% games−13.2% vs expected
Miranda Harmon + Anna Koltchagova224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Jenkins
36W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.85
Jessica Sherman
27W–52L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Amelia Blankenship
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Michelle Then
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Miranda Harmon
27W–26L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Rebekah Schloemann
99W–57L career · 6 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Nicole Bullock
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Anneliese Carr
87W–100L career · 3 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
4
Anna Koltchagova
182W–161L career · 8 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Rochelle Grieco
226W–191L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Emily Culbreth
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.