Teams

Brookhaven/Schmeltz W3.5S

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Sunday · W3.5S

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for W3.5S have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Stephanie Shah
published
3.35
Amy Loehr
published 3.5
3.31
Jana Chester
published
3.31
Elizabeth Parsons
published
3.30
Marci Frenkel
published
3.26
Jena Anderson
published
3.26
Eimear May
published
Denise Lytle
published 3.5
2.81
Katherine Weeks
published
2.80
Diana Dildy
published 3
Evelyn Werbaneth
published
Kim Schmeltz
published
Laurie Renwick
published
Melissa Brueningsen
published
Michelle Hrnicek
published
Patricia Jacobs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evelyn Werbaneth + Laurie Renwick033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Shah
29W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Amy Loehr
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.35
Jana Chester
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.31
Elizabeth Parsons
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Marci Frenkel
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Jena Anderson
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Eimear May
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Denise Lytle
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katherine Weeks
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Diana Dildy
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Evelyn Werbaneth
1W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim Schmeltz
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laurie Renwick
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Brueningsen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Hrnicek
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Jacobs
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.