Teams

WNCV Binns (ARC S)

Adult 40 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 40 & O 3.5 Women Tuesday & Friday evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-06vs WNCD Andrews (ARC S)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Blum / Maria Dolbow vs Danielle Andrews / Susan Cook3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHilary Krueger / Lisa Klepper vs Kara Candler / Alice Chen4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesWendy Yount / Rebecca Loftin vs Zsuzsanna Brooks / Bethany Smith-Martin1-6, 2-6
2025-04-01vs WNCD Andrews (ARC S)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMaria Dolbow / Alex Diez vs Danielle Andrews / Susan Cook6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesVanessa Binns / Lisa Klepper vs Nancy Izzo / Lisbeth Scharf6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEleanor Thompson / Betsy Klein vs Kari Hubbard / Stephanie Mason6-3, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & O 3.5 Women Tuesday & Friday evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Jill Champlin
published
Alex Diez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Betsy Klein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Maria Dolbow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Cheryl Blum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Lisa Klepper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Wendy Yount
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Hilary Krueger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Terry Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Rebecca Loftin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Hardy
published
Meredith Love
published
Vanessa Binns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Champlin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Alex Diez
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Betsy Klein
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Maria Dolbow
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Cheryl Blum
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Lisa Klepper
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Wendy Yount
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Hilary Krueger
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Terry Davis
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Rebecca Loftin
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.76
Karen Hardy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Meredith Love
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Binns
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.