Teams

Chung - Alley Cats 40+ 4.0

2025 Howard Adult 40 & Over · Howard Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.80 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-17vs Engler - 40 Aces 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Steffen / Lisa Walsh vs Meghan Smith / Katherine Dodson5-7, 4-6
2025-07-12vs MacDonald - MacAttack 4.0 40+Won 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Carroll / Kim Steffen vs Cintya Leveque / Linda Deanto6-1, 6-1
2025-07-09vs Tetrault - Spin-derellas 40 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesSanghee Lee / Chanpen Teeranon vs Kim Chamberlain / Na Yi7-6, 3-3
2025-07-01vs MacDonald - MacAttack 4.0 40+Split 11
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Christina Truax6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKim Steffen / Lisa Walsh vs Samantha Gass / Susan Rhee0-6, 0-6
2025-06-30vs Mahoney/Bartolotta 40 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChanpen Teeranon / Jennifer Coady vs Lynn Bartolotta / Christy Sloan3-6, 2-6
2025-06-26vs Engler - 40 Aces 4.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Diana Engler6-0, 6-2
2025-06-11vs Mahoney/Bartolotta 40 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesErin Kim / Kim Steffen vs Jennifer Lee / Joan Garlow4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Sara Orthwein3-6, 3-6
2025-06-07vs Engler - 40 Aces 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Riley / Chanpen Teeranon vs Michele Adams / Brenda Crowe6-2, 6-2
2025-05-31vs MacDonald - MacAttack 4.0 40+Split 11
W#1 DoublesKim Steffen / Diane Carroll vs Mary Shawhan / Christina Truax2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Linda Tsai vs Eileen Dietz / Julie Swartz4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Chanpen Teeranon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Michele Bloom
published
3.70
Kim Steffen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Jennifer Coady
published
3.68
Cathy Robertson
published 4
3.55
Jennifer Yang
published
3.50
Sanghee Lee
published
3.46
Anna Shin
published 3.5
3.44
Elvira McCullough
published
3.37
Lisa Walsh
published
3.35
Linda Tsai
published
3.35
Sung Cho
published
3.29
GENA CHUNG
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Elizabeth Amerault
published
3.04
Karen Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sung Cho + GENA CHUNG044 matchesnot enough data
Sung Cho + Sanghee Lee314 matchesnot enough data
GENA CHUNG + Linda Tsai314 matchesnot enough data
GENA CHUNG + Sanghee Lee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chanpen Teeranon
208W–208L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Michele Bloom
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Kim Steffen
114W–95L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Jennifer Coady
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Cathy Robertson
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Jennifer Yang
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Sanghee Lee
37W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Anna Shin
20W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Elvira McCullough
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Lisa Walsh
24W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Linda Tsai
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Sung Cho
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
GENA CHUNG
122W–130L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Elizabeth Amerault
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Maria Cristina Sanchez
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Karen Jones
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.