Teams

CJensen (BCC)

2025 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 7.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.61 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-10vs LAndersen (Shannamara)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Guth / Michelle Lynch vs Teresa Richardson / Allison Moseley7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarlene Delorenzo / Julie Derrico vs Vanessa Pomfrey / Loretta Anderson0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Stepp / Dori Cazorla vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ison / Kimberly Guth vs Laurie Rosser / Melissa Habegger7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTiffani Wagner / Julie Derrico vs Alexis Galbreath / Dany Marie2-6, 5-7
2025-09-19vs KCrane (Palisades)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesCarlene Delorenzo / Irene Rapaglia vs Brenda Usina / Jennifer Gluff6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen Stepp / January Crimin vs Sandy Mullis / Kelli Crane2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-12vs KFoster (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesIrene Rapaglia / Tiffani Wagner vs Karen Foster / Lynette Hague7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathleen Stepp / Terri Kletch vs Lydia Schoeck / Julie Smallwood6-4, 6-2
2025-09-05vs KWahr/AYancey (Carmel)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly Guth / Jennifer Ison vs Molly Morris / Lauren Mulligan6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHolly Disser / January Crimin vs Jenn Mattscheck / Mary Kate Watkins6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarlene Delorenzo / Irene Rapaglia vs Wendi Brown / Tara Walker6-2, 6-2
2025-09-04vs LPowell/HJohnson (Life Time)Split 11
L#1 DoublesHolly Disser / Dori Cazorla vs Michelle Crawford / Emily Breeze Watson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Derrico / Jennifer Meads vs Diane Hunter / Nicola Gallagher2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-29vs AVanMeter/KFulcomer (Southampton)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Lynch / Irene Rapaglia vs Katherine Fulcomer / Kim Rivera1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Stepp / January Crimin vs Diane Ward / Janice Daniel3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJigisha Thaker / Tiffani Wagner vs Dorothy Ilse / Shelly Steffey6-7, 2-6
2025-08-15vs KCrosby/MMetzl (Sardis)Split 11
W#1 DoublesIrene Rapaglia / Michelle Lynch vs Kathryn Martin / Anne Whalan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDori Cazorla / Tiffani Wagner vs Karan Waddell / Martha Metzl2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Holly Disser
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.69
Irene Rapaglia
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.51
Kimberly Guth
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.46
Michelle Lynch
published
3.35
Jennifer Ison
published
3.31
Kathleen Stepp
published
3.28
Terri Kletch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Heather Barker
published
3.22
Jennifer Meads
published
3.17
Julie Derrico
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
January Crimin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Carlene Delorenzo
published 3.5
3.12
Jigisha Thaker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Tiffani Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Dori Cazorla
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dori Cazorla + Holly Disser15366% games+14.0% vs expected
January Crimin + Holly Disser9264% games+10.4% vs expected
Jennifer Ison + Kimberly Guth3646% games+3.3% vs expected
Michelle Lynch + Irene Rapaglia2543% games−0.1% vs expected
Dori Cazorla + January Crimin141449% games−1.8% vs expected
Tiffani Wagner + Julie Derrico2441% games−8.3% vs expected
Dori Cazorla + Julie Derrico51040% games−11.0% vs expected
Holly Disser + Irene Rapaglia9263% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Holly Disser
184W–43L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Irene Rapaglia
104W–64L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Kimberly Guth
90W–88L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Michelle Lynch
15W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Jennifer Ison
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.35
Kathleen Stepp
12W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
3.5
Terri Kletch
60W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Heather Barker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jennifer Meads
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
3.5
Julie Derrico
86W–94L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
January Crimin
79W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Carlene Delorenzo
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Jigisha Thaker
64W–65L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Tiffani Wagner
57W–88L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
3.5
Dori Cazorla
79W–92L career · 3 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.