Teams

MC Schimpf FWL A18-3.5M

2025 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL A18&O 3.5 M (8 player)

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-01-25vs WH Leneway FWL A18-3.5MWon 21
W#1 DoublesThomas Clark / Timothy Milroy vs Jeff Lehmann / Brian Fleckenstein6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJuan Santos vs Andis Svikis6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Schimpf / Arthur Sayers vs Jason Broadhurst / Matthew Fries6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-12-14vs PTC Lawrence FWL A18-3.5MLost 12
L#1 DoublesThomas Clark / John Schimpf vs Joe Herp / Aidan van Singel7-6, 5-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJuan Santos vs Tristan Marshall6-2, 3-6
L#2 DoublesArthur Sayers / Sam Ambrose vs Wayne Lawrence / Brent Leist3-6, 4-6
2024-11-16vs MVS Anastasiu FWL A18-3.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesJohn Schimpf / Thomas Clark vs Alex McClure / Joshua Welt2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJuan Santos vs Fabien Chevrier0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSam Ambrose / Tyler Nobel vs Robert Williams / Cristian Anastasiu3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSam Ali / Arthur Sayers vs Sergio Cuison / Kyle Iverson2-6, 0-6
2024-11-02vs MVH Vivas FWL A18-3.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesThomas Clark / John Schimpf vs Jose Vivas / Brian Buurma3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesTyler Nobel vs Pedro Martinez5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesArthur Sayers / Than Oo vs Jon Zondervan / Jorge Vazquez6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJuan Santos vs Jason Birky0-6, 0-6
2024-10-19vs PTC Dreisbach FWL A18-3.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Schimpf / Arthur Sayers vs Dan DeHaan / David Tarnow5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJuan Santos vs Mike Borda6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSam Ali / Richard Lehman vs Robert Faber / Mark Wallis0-6, 0-6
2024-10-05vs PY Foti FWL A18-3.5MLost 14
W#1 DoublesThomas Clark / Timothy Milroy vs Jon Moyle / Robert Foti5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJohn Schimpf vs Matthew Freer1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSam Ali / Arthur Sayers vs Lawrence Czubak / Mark Schultz1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJuan Santos vs Paul Cheng4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTyler Nobel / Richard Lehman vs Christopher Carnes / Troy Bach1-6, 4-6
2024-09-07vs MVC Tenace FWL A18-3.5MLost 13
L#1 DoublesJohn Schimpf / John Ryan vs Jason Tenace / James Gage3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJuan Santos vs Bobby Bolt0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTyler Nobel / Sam Ambrose vs Adam Vincent / Rafael Bilbao6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesThomas Clark vs Trevor Webb2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WMI FWL A18&O 3.5 M (8 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PTC Dreisbach FWL A18-3.5M6126924237
2PY Foti FWL A18-3.5M61251024253
3MVS Anastasiu FWL A18-3.5M52231226222
4MVH Vivas FWL A18-3.5M43201532294
5PTC Lawrence FWL A18-3.5M34171838303
6MVC Tenace FWL A18-3.5M34161941319
7MC Schimpf FWL A18-3.5M1662961387
8WH Leneway FWL A18-3.5M0772858383

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Scott Hamric
published
3.33
Timothy Milroy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Juan Santos
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.12
Tyler Nobel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Thomas Clark
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.05
Arthur Sayers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.04
John Schimpf
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.85
Sam Ali
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Lehman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sam Ambrose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Than Oo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Clark + Arthur Sayers11755% games+4.7% vs expected
Thomas Clark + John Schimpf91546% games−1.3% vs expected
Tyler Nobel + Sam Ambrose2448% games−2.2% vs expected
John Schimpf + Timothy Milroy1640% games−2.5% vs expected
John Schimpf + Arthur Sayers4940% games−6.0% vs expected
Timothy Milroy + Scott Hamric11458% games−9.0% vs expected
John Schimpf + Tyler Nobel0626% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Clark + Timothy Milroy3249% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Hamric
52W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Timothy Milroy
100W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Juan Santos
20W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Tyler Nobel
10W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Thomas Clark
72W–114L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
3.5
Arthur Sayers
29W–49L career · 6 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
John Schimpf
59W–105L career · 7 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Sam Ali
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.85
Richard Lehman
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sam Ambrose
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Than Oo
12W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.