Teams

BBTL40/Moore/HL

Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Cristina Garrett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Martha Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Deanne Coad
published 3.5
3.15
Teresa Moore
published
3.14
Debbi Marler
published 3.5
3.10
2.80
Laura Rosen
published
2.73
Kim Izzie
published
2.73
Darby Bowden
published 3
2.67
2.65
Lisa Cotter
published
2.52
Denise Procida
published 3
2.38
Kara Hounam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Cotter + Denise Procida6455% games+4.8% vs expected
Debbi Marler + Teresa Moore5356% gamesnot enough data
Kara Hounam + Darby Bowden3358% gamesnot enough data
Kim Izzie + Lisa Cotter314 matchesnot enough data
Debbi Marler + Martha Watkins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cristina Garrett
30W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Martha Watkins
27W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Deanne Coad
39W–33L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Teresa Moore
14W–12L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Debbi Marler
40W–23L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Doreen Miller-Richard
7W–21L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Laura Rosen
53W–39L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Kim Izzie
24W–20L career · no lines in 2026
0%5%95%
2.73
3
Darby Bowden
23W–20L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Mary Catherine Moore
17W–18L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Lisa Cotter
20W–9L career · no lines in 2026
0%15%85%
2.65
3
Denise Procida
25W–19L career · no lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
2.52
Kara Hounam
16W–14L career · no lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.