Teams

Aches & Pains

Adult 55 and Over Summer · 8.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.86 / EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-30vs Volley LlamasWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Christine / Deborah Exley vs Louise Bowman / Shelley Berger6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Scott / Elaine Lawrence vs Deanne Milburn / Nancy Werteen6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEileen Neff / Linda Perilla vs Marie L McCall / Joanne Palumbo6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-23vs Volley LlamasLost 12
W#1 DoublesDeborah Exley / Merry Krauz vs Debra Lorah / Nan Barash3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Peters / Tina Test vs Louise Bowman / VERONICA ELIAS6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Perilla / Pat Maggitti vs Shelley Berger / Marie L McCall1-6, 2-6
2025-07-21vs Volley LlamasWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Christine / Heidi Pernia vs Debra Lorah / Torrie Kline6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTina Test / Susan Scott vs Deanne Milburn / Laura Brasher6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEileen Neff / Pat Maggitti vs Joyce Greaser / Joanne Palumbo6-2, 6-2
2025-07-21vs Volley LlamasWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeidi Pernia / Anne Russell vs Shelley Berger / Debra Lorah6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Peters / Elaine Lawrence vs Louise Bowman / VERONICA ELIAS6-3, 6-1
2025-07-16vs Volley LlamasWon 20
W#1 DoublesMerry Krauz / Elaine Lawrence vs Louise Bowman / VERONICA ELIAS6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLinda Peters / Tina Test vs Debra Lorah / Marie L McCall7-6, 6-3
2025-07-09vs Volley LlamasWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Peters / Anne Russell vs Torrie Kline / Marie L McCall6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElaine Lawrence / Merry Krauz vs Debra Lorah / Nancy Werteen6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLinda Perilla / Eileen Neff vs Joyce Greaser / Joanne Palumbo7-5, 6-4
2025-06-18vs Volley LlamasWon 21
L#1 DoublesEileen Neff / Pat Maggitti vs Debra Lorah / Nan Barash2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMerry Krauz / Deborah Exley vs Torrie Kline / Shelley Berger6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTina Test / Susan Scott vs Nancy Werteen / Deanne Milburn6-4, 6-3
2025-06-11vs Volley LlamasWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Peters / Amy Christine vs Debra Lorah / Torrie Kline6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElaine Lawrence / Deborah Exley vs Louise Bowman / Marie L McCall7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Perilla / Eileen Neff vs Deanne Milburn / Laura Brasher7-6, 7-6
2025-06-09vs Volley LlamasSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Christine / Deborah Exley vs Nan Barash / Debra Lorah5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHeidi Pernia / Linda Peters vs Shelley Berger / Laura Brasher6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Aches & Pains0920719206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Eileen Neff
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.86
Anne Russell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Elaine Lawrence
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.84
Jeannine McGhie
published 4
3.82
Heidi Pernia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Deborah Exley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Merry Krauz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Tina Test
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Amy Christine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Linda Peters
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Linda Perilla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Pat Maggitti
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Anne Fields
published 3.5
Susan Scott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Russell + Tina Test3263% games+7.1% vs expected
Deborah Exley + Amy Christine6260% games+5.9% vs expected
Deborah Exley + Elaine Lawrence16654% games+4.8% vs expected
Anne Russell + Heidi Pernia10363% games+4.8% vs expected
Elaine Lawrence + Tina Test6257% games+2.3% vs expected
Amy Christine + Tina Test3350% games−1.3% vs expected
Amy Christine + Anne Fields71151% games−2.9% vs expected
Merry Krauz + Elaine Lawrence314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eileen Neff
47W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Anne Russell
169W–78L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Elaine Lawrence
109W–98L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Jeannine McGhie
60W–55L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Heidi Pernia
127W–82L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Deborah Exley
43W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
4
Merry Krauz
21W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Tina Test
76W–67L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
4
Amy Christine
47W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Linda Peters
135W–102L career · 6 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Linda Perilla
99W–143L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Pat Maggitti
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Anne Fields
26W–40L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Susan Scott
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.