Teams

Lynch/Bryant/BP

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Laura Titus
published
3.45
Wendy Lynch
published
3.37
Leslie Lants
published
3.33
Kim Worrell
published
3.32
Susan Gammill
published
3.31
Elizabeth Jara
published
3.29
Jessica Donahue
published
3.24
Schelle Fike
published
3.21
Manda Wood
published
3.15
Lisa Breeding
published
2.89
Ruth Narveson
published
2.87
Becky Marks
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Breeding + Jessica Donahue6948% games+4.0% vs expected
Leslie Lants + Laura Titus22957% games+1.6% vs expected
Schelle Fike + Susan Gammill213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Breeding + Susan Gammill123 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Narveson + Becky Marks303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Titus
27W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Wendy Lynch
17W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
Leslie Lants
30W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
Kim Worrell
32W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
Susan Gammill
18W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Elizabeth Jara
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Jessica Donahue
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Schelle Fike
16W–31L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
Manda Wood
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Lisa Breeding
15W–21L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Ruth Narveson
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.89
3
Becky Marks
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.