Teams

Williams Y - Halusek

2021 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Men · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-23vs Eagle Harbor - DavisLost 01
L#2 DoublesRon Martin / Scott Neumann vs Ryan Mitchell / Dan Singleton4-6, 2-6
2021-03-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesKenneth Wood / Charles McGehee vs Scott Stainken / David Weihe6-0, 7-5
2021-02-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Halusek / Scott Neumann vs Michael Lege / Robert Williamson3-6, 3-6
2021-01-31vs Eagle Harbor - PinkermanLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoseph Travers / Felix Nazareno vs Steve Andersen / Larry Townsend5-7, 4-6
2021-01-24vs Jax Golf - HurseyWon 10
W#3 DoublesKenneth Wood / Charles McGehee vs Bill Merriam / Lyle Hursey6-3, 6-2
2021-01-17vs Huguenot - McGintyWon 10
W#3 DoublesKenneth Wood / Charles McGehee vs George Hansen / David Drill6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Eric Leach
published 4.5
3.91
Eugene Kasper
published 4
Felix Nazareno
published 4
3.68
Scott Neumann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Joseph Travers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
3.43
Michael Halusek
published
Charles McGehee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
John Setzler
published
Kenneth Wood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles McGehee + Joseph Travers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Leach
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Eugene Kasper
20W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%23%
3.91
4
Felix Nazareno
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Neumann
39W–42L career · 2 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
Joseph Travers
41W–60L career · 1 line in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Hans Vanden Noort
1W–8L career · no lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
3.45
Michael Halusek
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Charles McGehee
46W–55L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
John Setzler
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kenneth Wood
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.