Teams

CC Avila Lee 3.5W

2025 USTA CC Winter Adult 40 & OVER · CC USTA 3.5W 40 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-12vs CC Avila Slam Sisters 3.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristen Escobar / Marie Loughead vs Sue Haas / Janet Windman6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGretel Crum vs Jennifer Swanson6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKanako Nakajima / Maren Linkugel vs Cherie Charbonneau / Diana Salcedo7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-23vs CC Avila Slam Sisters 3.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeborah Clark / Maren Linkugel vs Rachel Janai / Deborah Cherry3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesGretel Crum vs Melbra King6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKanako Nakajima / Claire Lee vs Elisabeth Grossman / Erin Sjoholm1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-22vs LLW - CC Avila Fireballs 3.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarie Loughead / Kristen Escobar vs Deborah VANDENBERG / Jessica Blackburn0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesGretel Crum vs Kelley Munson0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClaire Lee / Kanako Nakajima vs Bonnie Lynam / Karen Gordon4-6, 0-6
2025-02-15vs LLW - CC Avila Fireballs 3.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesClaire Lee / Gretel Crum vs Kelley Munson / Jessica Blackburn0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMaren Linkugel vs Jiao Hua Zhou0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarie Loughead / Kristen Escobar vs Colleen Moss / Deborah VANDENBERG1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA 3.5W 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Kristen Escobar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Gretel Crum
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Marie Loughead
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Kanako Nakajima
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Maren Linkugel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Claire Lee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Andrea Galvan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Escobar + Marie Loughead123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Escobar
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Gretel Crum
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15
Marie Loughead
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.04
Kanako Nakajima
18W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Maren Linkugel
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Claire Lee
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Andrea Galvan
1W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.