Teams

MJarzynski (Park Road)

2024 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-08-04vs DDemaine (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMichal Jarzynski vs Kevin Baker1-6, 3-6
2024-08-01vs MSermer (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#2 SinglesDamian Hamp-Adams vs Andrew Dsouza6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMichal Jarzynski vs Curtis Crews6-2, 6-1
2024-07-31vs MThompson (Windyrush)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesHeyward Bouknight vs ROB SAPPENFIELD5-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesDamian Hamp-Adams vs Mike Thompson4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJared Kleber vs Ian Klass7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-25vs RZamudio (Col Beatty)Split 11
L#1 SinglesHeyward Bouknight vs Alec Beaver2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJared Kleber vs Ross Berger6-1, 6-4
2024-07-11vs JDichak (WSRC)Split 11
L#2 SinglesJared Kleber vs Eric O'Brien4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMichal Jarzynski vs Chris Landy6-2, 6-4
2024-06-27vs GEstrada (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesMichal Jarzynski vs Ivan Blakeney6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDamian Hamp-Adams vs Daniel Gonzalez6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMichal Jarzynski vs Scott Hamer6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHeyward Bouknight vs Aaron Ligon6-3, 6-1
2024-06-17vs MTwer (WSRC)Won 10
W#3 SinglesDamian Hamp-Adams vs Michael Twer6-1, 7-6
2024-06-13vs WLewis (Charlotte Tennis NC)Won 10
W#3 SinglesDamian Hamp-Adams vs Aaron Borders6-2, 6-2
2024-05-30Lost 01
L#3 SinglesJared Kleber vs Xuejun Zhu6-7, 3-6
2024-05-23vs EWeinbrenner (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#2 SinglesMichal Jarzynski vs Jeremy Rhoten6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Michal Jarzynski
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4
3.55
George T Stackpole
published
3.47
Damian Hamp-Adams
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Bashaar El Fasid
published 3.5
3.37
Heyward Bouknight
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Jared Kleber
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michal Jarzynski
80W–82L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
George T Stackpole
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Damian Hamp-Adams
75W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Bashaar El Fasid
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Heyward Bouknight
51W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3
Jared Kleber
34W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.