Teams

LATA18/Price/CAMP

2025 SC Singles 18 & Over - SC · Adult Women - 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-20vs LATA18/Mathias/QVSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLisette Geib vs Reka Corley6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesRayanne Moura vs Terri Stokes6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-11vs LATA18/Piper/CAMPSplit 11
W#2 SinglesLisette Geib vs Kelsey Piotrowski7-6, 6-2
L#3 SinglesHelen Cupertino vs Wendel Franklin2-6, 1-6
2025-08-30vs LATA18/Piper/CAMPWon 21
L#1 SinglesRayanne Moura vs Becky Piper1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesLisette Geib vs Jenny Burden4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesApril Holt vs Aimee Zmroczek6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-23vs LATA18/Mathias/QVLost 02
L#2 SinglesHelen Cupertino vs Libby Mathias2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAnnagrace Jeffcoat vs Nonie Morris3-6, 4-6
2025-08-19vs LATA18/Piper/CAMPLost 12
W#1 SinglesLisette Geib vs Kelsey Piotrowski3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBeverly Campbell vs Wendel Franklin5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesHelen Cupertino vs Morgan Sweeney1-6, 0-6
2025-08-02vs LATA18/Mathias/QVWon 21
W#1 SinglesLisette Geib vs Libby Mathias2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMolly Price vs Barbara Belquist3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesRayanne Moura vs Nonie Morris5-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Lisette Geib
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.07
Beverly Campbell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
3.01
Helen Cupertino
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.90
Molly Price
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.85
April Holt
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.78
Rayanne Moura
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.60
Annagrace Jeffcoat
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Cupertino + Annagrace Jeffcoat213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisette Geib
32W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3
Beverly Campbell
49W–15L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.07
Helen Cupertino
38W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Molly Price
27W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
April Holt
26W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
Rayanne Moura
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Annagrace Jeffcoat
22W–17L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.