Teams

FREMONT HILLS CC CW5.5A-DT

2024 COMBO - Daytime · Women 5.5

23 players · average NTRP 2.78 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Rebecca Gyr
published
3.34
Jenny Peck
published
3.14
Keryun Dukellis
published
3.07
Nina Ye
published
3.02
Jung Yoon
published
2.97
Chi Buckley
published 3
2.96
Jillian Draeger
published
2.91
Chunhong Zhou
published 3
2.84
Sabrina Dong
published
2.81
Angela Akiyama
published 3
2.79
Elaine Chong
published
2.72
Debbie Liu
published 3
2.70
Nicole Borau
published
2.69
Joanna Berry
published
2.67
Leslie Behar
published
2.64
Ree Noh
published
2.47
Mallary Alcheck
published
2.38
Carissa Karcher
published 3
2.28
Christine Bruckner
published 2.5
2.20
Betsy Schmitt
published 2.5
2.18
Stella Lee
published
2.10
Alane Kataria
published 2.5
2.08
Dale Tritschler
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chi Buckley + Jenny Peck224 matchesnot enough data
Elaine Chong + Jillian Draeger404 matchesnot enough data
Mallary Alcheck + Christine Bruckner123 matchesnot enough data
Angela Akiyama + Elaine Chong303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Gyr
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Jenny Peck
28W–20L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Keryun Dukellis
25W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.14
Nina Ye
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jung Yoon
21W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.02
3
Chi Buckley
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Jillian Draeger
29W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.96
3
Chunhong Zhou
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.91
Sabrina Dong
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%1%99%
2.84
3
Angela Akiyama
24W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
Elaine Chong
42W–27L career · no lines in 2024
0%2%98%
2.79
3
Debbie Liu
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Nicole Borau
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%8%92%
2.70
Joanna Berry
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%9%91%
2.69
Leslie Behar
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%12%88%
2.67
Ree Noh
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%16%84%
2.64
Mallary Alcheck
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%58%42%
2.47
3
Carissa Karcher
0W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
2.38
2.5
Christine Bruckner
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Betsy Schmitt
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.20
Stella Lee
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Alane Kataria
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Dale Tritschler
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.