← Teams

SAC-Vu

2020 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.28 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Mitchell Whitehurst
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Jay Mark
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Craig Frasier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Jeff Wheeler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
John Bergin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Colin Looi
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.92
Donny Cablao
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Ed de la Fuente
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.51
Dave Sato
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-11-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJohn Bergin / Mitchell Whitehurst vs David Mealey / Charles Wickens6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEd de la Fuente / Russell Ries vs James Carey / John Erickson6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCraig Frasier / John Smith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-11-02Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJohn Bergin / Russell Ries vs Tom Sloan / Paul Kerkar6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeff Wheeler / Ed de la Fuente vs Jeffrey Bayless / Chip Burczak6-2, 6-3
2019-10-26Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDonny Cablao / Colin Looi vs Charles Wickens / David Mealey7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAtul Bhargava / Jay Mark vs Andrew Daddio / Paul Best6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2019-10-13Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMitchell Whitehurst / John Bergin vs Carl McConnell / Jeff Anhaltzer6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJeff Wheeler / Dave Sato vs James Stenger / Robert Cohns6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCary Gatzke / Ed de la Fuente vs John Casale / Kevin Meier6-3, 7-5
2019-10-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCraig Frasier / Atul Bhargava vs Jon Mandeville / Steven Darling6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBinh Vu / Jay Mark vs Bob Curry / Dennis Scott6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeff Wheeler / Colin Looi vs Jerry Bond / Ronald Huggins7-5, 6-4
2019-09-29Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBinh Vu / Jay Mark vs John Knudson-Martin / Kevin Semonsen6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDonny Cablao / Dave Sato vs Jim Johnston / Bruce Baker6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEd de la Fuente / Cary Gatzke vs Calvin Chen / Jeff Ruby6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2019-09-20Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAtul Bhargava / Craig Frasier vs Scott Mayer / Randy Nicholson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEd de la Fuente / Mitchell Whitehurst vs Mike Mullen / Clark Cosart6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeff Wheeler / Dave Sato vs Michael Callahan / David Butts6-3, 6-1
2019-09-15Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesCraig Frasier / Binh Vu vs Steven Keo / James Lawrence6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Bergin / Donny Cablao vs Gerry Nuthmann / Wes Milligan6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Mitchell Whitehurst
90W–77L career
0%76%24%
3.53
3.5
Jay Mark
14W–28L career
2%89%8%
3.34
3.5
Craig Frasier
108W–75L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jeff Wheeler
30W–51L career
4%96%1%
3.22
3.5
John Bergin
16W–27L career
17%82%1%
3.13
3
Colin Looi
91W–53L career
0%56%44%
3.08
3
Donny Cablao
42W–50L career
0%85%15%
2.92
3
Ed de la Fuente
78W–81L career
0%99%0%
2.78
3
Dave Sato
40W–110L career
31%69%0%
2.51

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.