Teams

LCTA18/Cladakis/MPR

USTA 18 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 8.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.38 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Erik Loesch
published
4.26
Brandon Owens
published 4.5
4.25
George Clonts
published
Andrew Haefner
published 4.5
4.19
Catherine Weatherly
published 4.5
4.18
Emma Springs
published
4.13
Ike High
published
3.95
Lisa Rokahr
published
3.94
Benjamin King
published 4
3.94
Shane Brim
published
3.92
Nicole Owens
published
3.88
Juliann Loesch
published
3.56
Mike Cladakis
published
3.53
Lara Hobby
published
3.23
Steven Howle
published
Jane Eckhardt
published
Nick Cladakis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Loesch + Juliann Loesch5452% games+2.9% vs expected
Jane Eckhardt + Mike Cladakis224 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Owens + Brandon Owens213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erik Loesch
73W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Brandon Owens
33W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
4.26
George Clonts
37W–22L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Andrew Haefner
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Catherine Weatherly
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.19
Emma Springs
24W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
Ike High
28W–15L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
4.13
Lisa Rokahr
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Benjamin King
21W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.94
Shane Brim
62W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
Nicole Owens
39W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.92
Juliann Loesch
47W–49L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Mike Cladakis
40W–44L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Lara Hobby
29W–31L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
Steven Howle
33W–44L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Jane Eckhardt
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nick Cladakis
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.