Teams

EM GREEN

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-07vs CM GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesHillary Cecil / Sarah Odland vs Polly Warner / Stephanie Sabga2-6, 1-6
2024-07-24vs GTC PURPLESplit 11
L#1 DoublesEllen Leher / Hillary Biskner vs AMY SITZE / Teri Hetzel1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Klein / Sarah Odland vs Jada Dixon / Dianne Johnson-Pape7-6, 6-3
2024-07-17vs DTC BLUESplit 11
W#1 SinglesEllen Leher vs Jill Stein6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHillary Biskner / Hillary Cecil vs Christina Arnold / Ashley Stevens4-6, 2-6
2024-07-10vs SKY NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesHillary Cecil / Sarah Odland vs Sara Colvin / Amy Crockett4-6, 4-6
2024-07-03vs DTP YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHillary Cecil / Ellen Leher vs Kelly Dobson / Raquel Aiken6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSarah Odland vs Laurie Batchelder Adams4-6, 2-6
2024-06-26vs DTC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEllen Leher / Joy Jensen vs Marcy Eastman / Dana Pianowski6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHillary Cecil / Sarah Odland vs Tina Friedman / Kimberly Nanke7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Tammy Terhaar
published 3.5
3.35
Hillary Biskner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.11
Sarah Warfield
published
2.89
Sarah Odland
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.88
Ellen Leher
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.82
Joy Jensen
published
2.68
Kathy Klein
published
2.66
Hillary Cecil
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.54
Katie Lindsey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Odland + Hillary Cecil5451% games+1.9% vs expected
Hillary Cecil + Katie Lindsey224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tammy Terhaar
55W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3
Hillary Biskner
49W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.35
Sarah Warfield
20W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Sarah Odland
39W–34L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Ellen Leher
83W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Joy Jensen
26W–29L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Kathy Klein
13W–24L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Hillary Cecil
48W–42L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Katie Lindsey
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.