Teams

Countryside Mahler

2022 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over Weekend Winter · 7.0 W Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-20vs Pinellas - Tarpon/HellmersWon 10
W#3 DoublesLori Heffner / Karen Dee vs Ellen Hellmers / Gloria Dodson7-6, 6-0
2022-03-19vs ELW UselisLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Dee / Lori Heffner vs Teresa Orr / Lou Reavis6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2022-02-19vs Treasure Bay FrickeWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Dee / Lori Heffner vs Terry Kelsey / Carol Vitelli7-6, 6-1
2022-02-12vs Pinellas - Tarpon/HellmersWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Mahler / Lori Heffner vs Gail Eberhardt / Patricia Alfonso7-6, 6-2
2022-02-05vs ELW UselisWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Heffner / Karen Dee vs Lou Reavis / Teresa Orr6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Dee / Lori Heffner vs Susan Evans / Kelly Lang Cook2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-01-15vs Treasure Bay FrickeWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Dee / Lori Heffner vs Anne Remie / Beth Walters6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Barbera Loy
published 3.5
Brenda Lemoine
published 3.5
Debra Gross
published 3.5
Dina Glover
published 3.5
2.94
Lisa Lowe
published
2.80
Lisa Mahler
published
2.72
Diane Flammer
published 3
Karen Kovach
published
Kathy Pisciotta
published
Lori Heffner
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Kovach + Lisa Mahler224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Barbera Loy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Brenda Lemoine
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Debra Gross
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dina Glover
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Lowe
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.94
Lisa Mahler
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.80
3
Diane Flammer
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Karen Kovach
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Pisciotta
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Heffner
57W–65L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.