Teams

SLlewellyn 8.5 CAP

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-09vs MLaddSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Perdue / Benjamin Fortich vs Matthew Short / Kevin Wolborsky5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoon Kang / Matthew James vs EJ Mildwurf / Bruce Mildwurf2-6, 3-6
2022-09-25vs RMcClennyLost 02
L#2 DoublesRyan Lewis / Spencer Llewellyn vs Parker Sheridan / Blake Hutchinson4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMatthew James / Cesar Angulo vs Connor Wilkins / Patrick Shields3-6, 1-6
2022-09-23vs JVanDeWater(18+ Combo)Split 11
L#2 DoublesTyler Newman / Nick Gilder vs Mark Combs / Matthew Presser1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew James / Ryan Lewis vs Trey Coomes / Dennis Tran6-1, 6-2
2022-09-18vs DFarmer 18+ 8.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Fortich / Andrew Perdue vs Dempsey Farmer / Gregory Isabwa6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Lewis / Spencer Llewellyn vs Tommy Houston / Brent Nieri6-0, 6-3
2022-08-14vs IGRaschkeLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Perdue / Benjamin Fortich vs Preston Waldo / Sam Williams5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSpencer Llewellyn / Ryan Lewis vs Jon Davis / Howard Critcher6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMatthew James / Tyler Newman vs Michael Hoyle / Andrew Tate5-7, 4-6
2022-08-07vs RWalter 8.5 18+ RRCWon 10
W#3 DoublesRyan Lewis / Spencer Llewellyn vs Ryan Walter / Edward Farley6-0, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Andrew Perdue
published 4.5
4.31
Tyler Carroll
published
4.28
Spencer Llewellyn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.27
William Sendor
published
4.25
Gaurav Luther
published 4.5
4.24
Matthew James
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.95
Benjamin Fortich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Nick Gilder
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Perdue
38W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
4.42
Tyler Carroll
29W–29L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Spencer Llewellyn
231W–157L career · 10 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
William Sendor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Gaurav Luther
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Matthew James
67W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4
Benjamin Fortich
75W–25L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Nick Gilder
111W–89L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.