Teams

Payne - RS Hard

2023 Escambia Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-05vs Escambia- Haigler - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesGretchen Miller / Liz Payne vs Kaye Whittenberger / Judy Harrington1-6, 4-6
2023-02-19vs Escambia- Haigler - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesLiz Payne / Elaine Hayward vs Judy Harrington / Klara Szalai6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-05vs Escambia- Haigler - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesLiz Payne / Mary Benson vs Klara Szalai / Judy Harrington4-6, 3-6
2023-02-04vs Escambia- Haigler - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesLiz Payne / Allison McCrory vs Kaye Whittenberger / Sharon Powell6-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Liz Payne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Elaine Hayward
published
2.69
Allison McCrory
published 3
2.61
Margaret Menear
published
2.56
Gretchen Miller
published
Robin Rowan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Payne + Allison McCrory213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liz Payne
139W–105L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
Elaine Hayward
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Allison McCrory
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
Margaret Menear
18W–4L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.61
Gretchen Miller
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.56
Robin Rowan
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.