Teams

GJTC PDANIELS

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-24vs GJTC IANDREWSSplit 11
L#2 SinglesLaureen Cantwell vs Brittany Phillips4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDana Elliott / Nancy Paregien vs Dana Lee Dunn / Lindsay Dempsey3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-10vs GJTC DFABERSplit 11
L#1 SinglesNancy Paregien vs Danielle Martens4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLaureen Cantwell vs Tina Hulihee6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-03vs GJTC IANDREWSLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Ensley / Laureen Cantwell vs Angie Vance / Carla Kohls3-6, 4-6
2021-04-26vs GJTC KSNIDERLost 01
L#1 DoublesDana Elliott / Nancy Paregien vs Lisa Poudrier / Tammy Hopkins5-7, 3-6
2021-04-19vs GJTC DFABERLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatti Daniels / Nancy Paregien vs Denise Faber / Arliss Bridgett1-6, 4-6
2021-04-15vs GJTC DFABERWon 20
W#2 DoublesDIANE GRIFFITHS / Nancy Paregien vs Tracy Hughes / Heather Hughes6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaureen Cantwell / Ann Ensley vs Arliss Bridgett / Carol Serrano3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-05vs GJTC KSNIDERLost 01
L#3 DoublesDana Elliott / Laureen Cantwell vs Debbie Pruess / Karen Bowman3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

DIANE GRIFFITHS
published 4
3.69
Carrie Thornton
published 4
3.61
Laureen Cantwell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.60
3.26
Nancy Paregien
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Dana Elliott
published 3.5
Patti Daniels
published
Sierra Segrest
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Thornton + Amy Espinoza-Hurshman134 matchesnot enough data
Patti Daniels + Nancy Paregien213 matchesnot enough data
Dana Elliott + Laureen Cantwell033 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Thornton + DIANE GRIFFITHS213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
DIANE GRIFFITHS
10W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Carrie Thornton
60W–57L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Laureen Cantwell
27W–78L career · 5 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Amy Espinoza-Hurshman
29W–12L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
Nancy Paregien
85W–107L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Dana Elliott
4W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patti Daniels
11W–25L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sierra Segrest
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.