Teams

KY/LEX/SMITH/NEUMAN

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER LEXINGTON · 4.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-10vs KY/LEX/Owens/WhitnellWon 40
W#1 DoublesLily Le / Grace McGonigle vs Kylie Russ / Madison Eaton1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Kalinka vs Leah Schrass6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNancy Fallon / Keeana Boarman vs Claire Collins / Alexa Hardesty6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesClaire Smith / Sarah Sparks vs Erin Azbell / Jordan Reeves6-1, 6-2
2026-03-06vs KY/LEX/Miller/HixsonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesErika Clark / Kristen Kalinka vs Kathryn Wade / Karolyn Stanley6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJosefine Young / Jamie Leveridge vs Kristin Coffey / Hiroko Nakata6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesLily Le vs Laurie Larkin7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLynn Russo / Grace McGonigle vs Lisa Kattus / Marisol Valles7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-15vs KY/LEX/Owens/WhitnellWon 40
W#1 DoublesNancy Fallon / Julianne Neuman vs Megan Moore / Sarah Beth Waterman6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLily Le vs Ileana Contreras6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErika Clark / Jamie Leveridge vs Alexa Hardesty / Michelle Abou-Jaoude6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Russo / Keeana Boarman vs Leslie Russ / Claire Collins6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-10vs KY/LEX/Miller/HixsonLost 13
L#1 DoublesJulianne Neuman / Lily Le vs Kathryn Wade / Karolyn Stanley6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Sparks / Camille Morrow vs Rhonda Miller / Louise Ball1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesErika Clark vs Lee Ann Jung6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJosefine Young / Kelly Nicol vs Leslie Stone / Kristin Coffey2-6, 4-6
2026-02-01vs KY/LEX/Owens/WhitnellLost 13
L#1 DoublesGrace McGonigle / Kristen Kalinka vs Sarah Beth Waterman / Megan Moore2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesClaire Pinkston vs Hannah Wampler5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKeeana Boarman / Lily Le vs Danielle Johnson / Erin Brester6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesErika Clark vs Kylie Russ6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-01-13vs KY/LEX/Owens/WhitnellWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Sparks / Lily Le vs Hannah Wampler / Danielle Johnson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKeeana Boarman / Kristen Kalinka vs Sarah Owens / Madison Eaton6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesClaire Pinkston vs Brooke Bridges2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-11vs KY/LEX/Miller/HixsonWon 31
W#1 DoublesClaire Smith / Megan Huber vs Kathryn Wade / Karolyn Stanley4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLily Le vs Laurie Larkin2-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJill Smith / Erika Clark vs Kristin Coffey / Hiroko Nakata4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesClaire Pinkston vs Lee Ann Jung6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/SMITH/NEUMAN52231230269
2KY/LEX/Miller/Hixson43201537323
3KY/LEX/Owens/Whitnell26122862409

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Erika Clark
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
4.22
Keeana Boarman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.13
Julianne Neuman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
Kelly Nicol
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.07
Nancy Fallon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Kristen Kalinka
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.89
Camille Morrow
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.88
Claire Pinkston
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.88
Lily Le
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #1 Singles 18% · published
3.80
Jamie Leveridge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Sarah Sparks
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Josefine Young
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Grace McGonigle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Lynn Russo
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Megan Huber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josefine Young + Jamie Leveridge303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erika Clark
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
Keeana Boarman
11W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Julianne Neuman
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
Kelly Nicol
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
Nancy Fallon
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.07
Kristen Kalinka
15W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.94
4
Camille Morrow
22W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Claire Pinkston
6W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.88
Lily Le
47W–15L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
Jamie Leveridge
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Sarah Sparks
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Josefine Young
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Grace McGonigle
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Lynn Russo
134W–123L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Megan Huber
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.