Teams

5-JTillman-CHCC

2022 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · Eno River 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-09-29vs 7-SBrehm-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesMonica Jenkins / Lee Wollman vs Caroline Patzer / Sarah Ederle2-6, 1-6
2022-09-08vs 3-JHagerty-YMCALost 01
L#2 DoublesLee Wollman / Monica Jenkins vs Jennifer Sykes / Barbara St Clair4-6, 4-6
2022-08-25vs 1-DWebb -Eno- 55Lost 01
L#2 DoublesShelayne Sutton / Lee Wollman vs Tammy Bradley / Cecilia Edgar1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Monica Jenkins
published
3.16
Allison Worthy
published 3.5
2.94
Deon Roach
published 3.5
2.83
Kathryn Chan
published
2.76
Christy Bowman
published 3
2.58
Laurie Oakley
published
2.56
Lee Wollman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Janis Tillman
published
2.39
Julie Vozella
published
Karen Armstrong
published
Olga Murphy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Vozella + Laurie Oakley3544% games−3.4% vs expected
Janis Tillman + Lee Wollman134 matchesnot enough data
Deon Roach + Christy Bowman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica Jenkins
25W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Allison Worthy
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Deon Roach
6W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
Kathryn Chan
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Christy Bowman
6W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Laurie Oakley
6W–25L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Lee Wollman
47W–111L career · 3 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.56
Janis Tillman
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.49
Julie Vozella
6W–25L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.39
Karen Armstrong
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Olga Murphy
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.